05. Justification of running and perspective standards which will secure ploughed up soils against physical degradation

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201604-05
Medvediev V. V.
Pages: 19-23.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To justify the list and the contents of standards, capable to norm mechanical load on soil — the important cause of physical degradation. Methods. Field and office probes of influence of techniques and instruments of cultivation on physical properties of soils. On the basis of digitalized maps the squares of areas with degradation processes are calculated. Results. Destructure (formation of lumps and dust), augmentation of equilibrium firmness and negative transformation of pore space in ploughed up soils are the consequence of non-normed load of modern machine-tractor assembly units and instruments. The supervisory control of execution of the running standard of allowable pressure of road systems on soil, implementation and observance of new standards — that is an actual problem for adjustment of modern farming agriculture. Conclusions. Monitoring of physical properties of ploughed up soils and mechanical load during growing and harvesting crops should become obligatory. By use of standards it should be made impossible plastic deformation, formation of lumps, excessive crushing of soils, their overstocking in subseed layer and in plough base surface.

Key words: physical degradation, admissible mechanical load, designs of the newest standards.

References
  1. Database "Soil Properties of Ukraine" (Structure and usage- procedural Guide)//T.N. Laktionova, V.V. Medvedev, K.V. Savchenko et al.. 2nd edition/ Kharkiv, CT - #1, 2012. - 150 pps.
  2. Kushnarev A.C.//Mechanics of Soils: Tasks and Condition of Work//Mechanization and Electrification of Agriculture. - Moscow, 1987. - No. 3. pp. 9-13.
  3. Mobile Agricultural Machinery// Standards for normative allowance to machinery loading-pressure on soil// DSTU 4521: 2006//V.G. Yevgenko, T.E. Lindina, V.V. Medvedev et al - Kyiv .: DSTU (State-regulated Users’ Standard) of Ukraine, 2007. - 4 pps.
  4. Dumas W.T. //Controlling traffic in areases of cotton yields//W.T. Dumas, F.A. Komurer, K.A. Smith//Highlights Agr. Res - 1972. - V. 19. - 2. - 16 pps.
  5. Durr H. //Literatur-Studie Bodenverdichtung//H.J. Durr, H. Petelkau, C. Sommer//Institut fur Betriebstehnik der Bundesforschungsanstalt fur Landwirtschaft Braunschweig-Volkenrode (Fal). - 1995 - 203 pps.
  6. Geophysical Methods for Imaging Soil Compaction and Variability of Soil Texture on Farm Land//H. Peterson, H. Fieige, W. Rabbel et al//Advances in Geoecology 38, Soil Management for Sustainability, Catena Verlag GmbH, 35447, Reiskirchen, Germany. - 2006. - pp. 261-272.
  7. Hakansson I. //Machinery-induced Compaction of Arable Soils. Incidence-consequences-counter measures. //Uppsala Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences . Sweden - 2005 - 109 - 153 pps.
  8. Norn R.//Prediction of Mechanical Strength and Ecological Properties of Subsoil for Sustainable Land-use//Proc. of the workshop "Experiences with the impact of subsoil compression.// Uppsala - Sweden, 2000. - pp. 109-121.
  9. Soil studies in the laboratory are helping solve problems in the fields//Furrow. - 1976 - V. 81, lss. 6. pp. 116-17.
  10. Tijink F.G.J., van den Linden.//Engineering approaches to prevent subsoil compaction in cropping systems with sugar beet//Advances in Geoecology. - 2001. - V. 32. pp. - P442-452.