Moskalets' T. Z., Kalinichenko A.V., Moskalets' V.V.
Pages: 52-56.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To study tolerance of new genotypes of Tribus Triticeae on influence of Eurygaster integriceps Put. in conditions of forest-steppe and polisya-forest-steppe ecotopes. Methods. Field, laboratory, methods of mathematical statistics. Field: elaboration of experiment, formation of record plots, determination of biological yield of grain; laboratory: assessment of quantitative and quality parameters of grain, its damage by pests. Results. Population performances of Eurygaster integriceps Put are studied depending on genotype of cereal crop and ecological conditions. It is fixed that phytocenoses of triticale and rye are the unfavourable environmental niche for Eurygaster integriceps Put. in comparison with soft wheat. In this connection they are differentiated into improbable eco-niches (Borotba, Slavetne, AD 256, Chayan, DAU 5, Chornoostyste); probable eco-niches (Vivate Nosivske, Pshenychne, Avgusro, Yaguar); very probable eco-niches (Ellada). Conclusions. In conditions of foreststeppe and polissia-forest-steppe ecotopes sowings of soft winter wheat medium-serotinal and middle-ripening cultivars are less ecologically tolerant to imago of bug. It is fixed that genotypes of winter triticale are unfavourable environmental niche for pests-phytophags in comparison with wheat and rye. In this connection they are differentiated into improbable econiches (Slavetne, AD 256, Chayan, DAU 5, Chornoostyste); probable eco-niches (Vivate Nosivske, Pshenychne, Avgusto, Yaguar); very probable eco-niches (Ellada).

---

Key words: genotypes of soft winter wheat, winter rye and winter triticale, imago of Eurygaster integriceps Put., environmental niche, strategy of the supervisory control of density and numerosity of populations of the pest.

---

References

1. Sekun M.P. Harmful Turtle/M.P. Sekun. – K.: The world, 2002. – P. 9−11.
2. Grynyk I.V. Balanced Development of Agroecosystems on the Example of Chernihiv Region: Author's abstract. dis ... dr s.-g. Sciences: 03.00.16/Grynyk Igor Volodymyrovych; Institute of Agroecology and Biotechnology NAAS. – K., 2005. – 41 p.
3. Shpanev A.M. The Concept of Self-regulation of Biocenotic Processes in Agroecosystem./A.M. Shpanev, S.V. Golubev, A.F. Zubkov /Vestn. protection of plants.– 2007. – №4. – P. 3–27.
4. Dospekhov B.A. Methodology of Field Experience/B.A. Dospekhov. – M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. – 351 p.
5. Methodology of the State Variety Testing of the Crops/Ed. V.V. Wolkodav; State Commission of Ukraine for Testing and Protection of Plant Varieties. – K.: Alefa,, 2000. – Issue 1. – 100 p.
6. Methodology of Evaluation of Resistance of Wheat Varieties to Pests and Pathogens/S.O. Tribel, M.V. Hetman, O.O. Strigoon [and others]; for ed. S.O. Tribel. – K., 2010. –392 p.
7. Determinant of Agricultural Pests for Damage to Cultural Plants/M.B. Akhremovich, I.D. Batiashvili, G.Ya. Bey-Bienko and others; under Ed. G.E. Osmolovsky – L.: Kolos, 1976. – 696 p.
8. Moskalets V.V. Consortial role of the entomocomplex in the functioning of a triticale field/V.V. Moskalets http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Nd_2013_5_7.pdf –15 p.