Dzitsiuk V. V., Peredrij M. M.
Pages: 43-47.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To investigate cytogenetic characteristicsof cows which descend from the bulls gained by themethod of embrio-transplantation and cows-descendantsof bulls, born after artificial fertilization. Methods.Cultivation of lymphocytes, preparation of cytogeneticspecimens, classification and account of aberrationsof chromosomes realized under practical standards.Results. Abnormalities of karyotype of genome type(aneuploidy and polyploidy) and structural aberrationsof chromosomes (fragments, breakages, shortages andassociations of chromosomes) are determined by resultsof analysis. General frequency of karyotypic infringementsat cows-daughters of bulls from embryo-transplantationwas higher for 10% in comparison with indexat cows-daughters of bulls from artificial fertilization.At cows that had even one deadborn or spontaneousabortions, frequency of chromosomal infringements wasconsiderably higher, than at animals without coarse reproductiveinfringements. Conclusions. For preventingaccumulation of genetic imperfections in herds of cattleit is necessary to spend regular cytogenetic monitoringof animals.

---

Key words: cattle, transplantation of embryos, karyotype,aberrations of chromosomes.

---

References

1. Bakaj F.P. Tsytorehetycheckyj mohytopyhr kopob-dohopob embpyohob/F.P. Bakaj, M.D. Kamacho Chabappyia,D.M. Ctapoctyh//Cobpemehhble npoblemblb zootexhyy: cb. haychh. tp. – Ch. 1/Mock. roc. akad.bet. med. y byotexhol. – M., 2001. – C. 20 — 22.
2. Bovine embryo technologies/C. Galli, R. Duchi,G. Crotti et al.//Theriogenology. – 2003. – 59. –P. 599 — 616.
3. Hasler J.F. The current status and future ofcommercialembryo transfer in cattle/J.F. Hasler//AnimReprod Sci. – 2003. – 79. – P. 245 — 264.
4. Glazko T.T. Gehomhaia hectabylbhoctb y kohtpolb kopob dohopob embpyohob/ T.T. Glazko,G.Ju. Kocobckyj,B.Y. Glazko//Acnektbl penpodyktybhoj byotexholoryy. – Bbln. 1. – M.: Yzd-bo OOO«PPYJaTHAJa KOMPAHYJa», 2012. – C. 136 — 143.
5. Bzaymocbiazb rehomhoj hectabylbhocty y embpyonpodyktybhocty y kopob-dohopob embpyohob/T.T. Glazko, G.Ju. Kocobckyj, D.B. Ponob, A.B. Bpyryda//Betepyhapyia Kybahy. – 2015. – № 6. – C. 9 — 11.
6. Chepheba F.P. Accotsyatybhaia cnocobhoctb xpomocom y kopob-dohopob embpyohob/F.P. Chepheba//Aktyalbh. bonp. celekts.-nlemeh. pabotbl b zhybothobodctbe. – M., 1989. – C. 20 — 22.
7. Mamehko O.M. Pyzyky heratybhoro bnlyby ihdyctpialbhyx texholorij tbapyhhytstba ha blaronolychchia tbapyh (petpocnektyba i…?)/O.M. Mamehko//Ppoblemy zooihzhehepii ta betepyhaphoi medytsyhy:zb. hayk. np. – Byn. 31, Ch. 1/Xapk. depzh. zoobet.akad. – X., 2015. – C. 308 — 318.
8. Chromosome preparations of leucocytesculturedhuman peripheral blood/P. S Moorhead,P.C. Nowell, W.J. Mellman et al.//Exp. Cell Res. –1960. – № 20. – P. 613 — 616.
9. Ploxyhckyj H.A. Pykobodctbo no byometpyydlia zootexhykob/H.A. Ploxyhckyj. – M.: Koloc. – 1969. – 256 c.
10. Lakyh G.F. Byometpyia: ycheb. nocobye dlia byol.cnets. byzob. – 4-e yzd., nepepab. y don./G.F. Lakyh.– M.: Bblcsh. shk., 1990. – 352 c.
11. Bakaj A.B. Kapyotynycheckaia hectabylbhoctb y kopob b hopme y c hapyshehyiamy penpodyktybhblx fyhktsyj npy pazlychhblx bapyahtaxnodbopa/A.B. Bakaj, F.P. Bakaj, A.Y. Bakaj//Cb.haych. tpydob BCXA. Aktyalbhble npoblembl yhtehcybhoro pazbytyia zhybothobodctba. – 2014.Bbln. 17. – C. 3 — 12.
12. Bodyhoh A.C. Tsytorehetycheckye yzmehehyiab epytpotsytax bolbhblx atonycheckoj bpohxyalbhojactmoj/A.C. Bodyhoh, H.A. Pohomapeba, Z.Y. Abpamoba//Ychehble zanycky Kazahckoro roc. yh-ta. –2008. – T. 150. – C. 101 — 105.
13. Ylbyhckyx H.H. Ycnolbzobahye mykpoiadephorotecta b ckpyhyhre y mohytopyhre mytarehob/H.H. Ylbyhckyx, Y.H. Ylbyhckyx, B.H. Hekpacob//Tsytoloryia y rehetyka. – 1988. – T. 22, № 1. – C. 67 — 72.