Kukol K. P., Butsenko L. M., Patyka V. P.
Pages: 27-31.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To isolate and identify bacteria in structure of biome of plants of sugar beet, contaminated with black root of sugar beet. Methods. Field — for sampling plants with disease symptoms; laboratory (microbiological and phytopathological) — for allocation of bacteria in pure culture, determination of their disease-inciting power; biochemical — for determination of properties of the isolated bacteria. Results. Bacteriological analysis of samples of plants of sugar beet with typical symptoms of black root of sugar beet is carried out. Conclusions. Except for the basic causal organisms of black root of sugar beet, in structure of biome of plants of sugar beet, contaminated with black root of sugar beet they fixed presence of bacteria of stem Bacillus and pectolytic-active bacteria of Pectobacterium carotovorum which are capable to initiate putrefaction or reinforce pathological process caused by other microorganisms.

---

Key words: sugar beet, black root of sugar beet, contamination, biome, bacteria, properties, identification.

---

References

1. Lyhochvor V., Petrychenko V., Ivashhuk P., Kornijchuk O. (2010). Roslynnytstvo. Tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh. [Crop production. Technologies of growing crops]. L'viv: NVF«Ukr. tehnologii'». [in Ukrainian].
2. Trybel' S., Strygun O. (2012). Dynamika vyroshchuvannia tsukrovykh buriakiv v Ukraini ta fitosanitarnyi stan posiviv. [Dynamics of sugar beet growing in Ukraine and phytosanitary state of crops]. Scientific papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet. 14. 217–222. [in Ukrainian].
3. Pozhar Z. (1990). Kompleksnaja sistema zashhity saharnoj svekly ot boleznej. Jeffektivnye mery bor'by s boleznjami i vrediteljami pri intensivnoj tehnologii vozdelyvanija saharnoj svekly. [Complex system of protection of sugar beet from diseases. In Effective measures to control diseases and pests with intensive sugar beet cultivation technology]. Kiev: VNIIS, 5–9. [In Russian].
4. Roi'k M., Nurmuhammedov A., Kornijenko A. (2004). Khvoroby koreneplodiv tsukrovykh buriakiv. [Diseases of root crops of sugar beet]. Kyiv: PoligrafKonsaltyng. [in Ukrainian].
5. Sabluk V., Shendryk R., Zapol's'ka N. (2005). Shkidnyky ta khvoroby tsukrovykh buriakiv. [Pests and diseases of sugar beet]. Kiev: Koloobig. 448 s. [in Ukrainian].
6. Pinchuk N., Butkaljuk T., Vergeles P. (2016). Vstanovlennia osnovnykh zbudnykiv koreneida tsukrovykh buriakiv ta efektyvnist vykorystannia zakhodiv borotby. [Establishing the main causative agents black leg of sugar beet vegetables and the effectiveness of the use of response measures]. Agriculture and forestry. S. 245–254. [in Ukrainian].
7. Gvozdyak R., Pasichnyk L., Yakovleva L. et al. (2011). Fitopatohenni bakterii. Bakterialni khvoroby roslyn. [Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Bacterial Diseases of Plants]. Kyiv: OOO NPP Interservice. [in Ukrainian].
8. Bel'tjukova K., Matyshevskaja M., Kulikovskaja M., Sidorenko S. (1968). Metody issledovanij bakterial'nyh boleznej rastenij. [Methods for bacterial plant disease studies]. Kiev: Naukova dumka. [In Russian].
9. Klement Z., Rudolf K., Sands D. (1990). Methods in phyto­bacteriology. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado,. 568 p.
10. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic bacteriology. Second Edition. Springeu, 2005. V. 2, part B. 1106 p.
11. Maksimenko L., Parhomenko N., Moroz S., Gorb T. (2013). Izuchenie svojstv izoljatov pektolitiches­kih fitopatogennyh bakterij, vydelennyh v Ukraine. [Properties investigation of isolates of pectolitic phytopathogenic bacteria obtained in Ukraine]. Microbiol. J. 75 (6). S. 66–72 [In Russian].
12. Petrychenko V., Kornijchuk O., Pasichnyk L., Bucenko L., Zhytkevych N., Gnatjuk T., Patyka V. (2013). Bakterialni khvoroby silskohospodarskykh roslyn i pestytsydy. [Bacterial diseases of agricultural crops and pesticides]. News of agrarian sciences. 4. S. 21–26. [in Ukrainian].