Ziel'din V. F.
Pages: 38-41.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To study efficiency of different methods of placement of pigs under papillae of a sow. Methods. Productivity of animals was determined according to demands of «Instruction on bonitation of quality of pigs» and with the help of innovative method. Results. It is established in two runs that for farm the most effective method of placement of pigs under papillae of a sow is the following: strong pigs in a nest should be place to forward papillae, and weak ones — to back. It is proved that at such approach the authentic variance occurs at comparison of results of control group with indexes of IIIrd and Ist (monitoring) to such attributes: «specific weight of amount of weaners from number born», and «mass of a nest at a wean» at td2,1=6,38 and td2,3=6,34 by the first attribute, and td2,1=6,0 and td2,3=6,74 by the second attribute at number of degree of freedoms 38 in both events. Conclusions. It is expedient to make the first placement of strong pigs in a nest under the forward papillae of a sow, and weak ones — under back. That ensures in the further normal growth of pigs in a nest in conditions of adaptability to manufacture of their growth with human controller.

---

Key words: sow, papillae, pigs, placement, preservation, growth of animals, productivity.

---

References

1. Volkopyalov B.P. (1968). Svinovodstvo. [Pig]. Leningrad: Kolos, Leningradskoe otdelenie. P. 359 – 361. [in Russian].
2. Redkin A.P. (1948). Svinovodstvo. [Pig]. Moskva: Selhozgiz, P. 85–89. [in Russian].
3. Grudev D.I., Selvinskaya E.V. (1977). Povyshenie produktivnosti svinej. [Increasing the productivity of pigs]. Moskva: Rosselhozizdat. P. 44 – 45. [in Russian].
4. Karpenko I. (2017). Druhe dykhannia «Nyvy Trudovoi». [The second breath of "Niva Trudova"]. Tvarynnytstvo sohodni. № 9. P. 10–13. [in Ukrainian].
5. Balashov A.A. Sravnitelnaya ocenka korrelyacionnyh svyazej svinomatok v razreze oporosov. [Comparative evaluation of correlations of sows in the farrowing section of ]. Tvarynnytstvo sohodni. 2016. № 2. P. 5 – 6. [in Russian].
6. Voloshchuk V., Fydria M. (2015). Etolohichni osoblyvosti porosiat u kryzovyi period vidluchennia. [Ethological features of piglets during the crisis period of weaning.]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. № 8. C. 16 – 18. [in Ukrainian].
7. Voloshchuk V., Remizova Yu. (2015). Etolohichni osoblyvosti svynei pry riznykh tekhnolohichnykh rezhymakh utrymannia. [Ethological peculiarities of pigs under different technological conditions of retention]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. № 5. P. 18–20. [in Ukrainian].
8. Lykhach V. (2015). Tekhnolohichni osoblyvosti vyroshchuvannia porosiat. [Technological features of growing piglets]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. № 6. P. 11–13. [in Ukrainian].
9. Narizhna O., Vovk V. (2014). Produktyvnist svynomatok u poiednanni z riznymy henotypamy knuriv. [Sow productivity in combination with different genotypes of boars.]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. № 3–4. P. 25–27. [in Ukrainian].
10. Filatov A.S., Shkalenko V.V., Kukushkin I.Yu., Ruzhejnikov F.V. (2011). Dinamika zhivoj massy i myasnaya produktivnost podsvinkov raznyh porod. [Dynamics of live weight and meat productivity of springs of different breeds]. Svinovodstvo. № 3. P. 23–25. [in Russian].
11. Gedd Dzhon. (2009). O chem ne govoritsya v uchebnikah… [What is not mentioned in the textbooks ...]. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii.. № 2. P. 43–47. [in Russian].
12. Shejko I.P., Loban N.A., Vasilyuk O.Ya., Malikov I.S. Patent BY17677 Republic of Belarus, MPK AO1K 67/02 (2006 01). Sposob ocenki sochetaemosti roditelskih par svinej po myaso-otkormochnym kachestvam potokov. [A method for evaluating the compatibility of pigs' parental pairs with meat-feed qualities of streams]. Applicant and patent holder: Republican Unitary Enterprise "Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Belarus for Animal Husbandry. A.c. № 20100713, applican. 11.05.10. Posted. 30.10.13. [in Russian].