Moroz V. V., Kaplins'kyj V. V., Vorobel' M. I., Garmadij O. S.
Pages: 48-52.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To determine basic indexes of fermentation activity in dung of cows at mesophilic fermenting in anaerobic conditions (in vitro) at use of different biologically active specimens (BAS) and determination of efficiency of activation of methanogenesis processes. Methods. Chemical-analytical, mathematical-statistical. Results. Experimentally it is proved that biologically active specimens raise level of CO2 and CH4 in manure substratum. Liberation of these gases was more in comparison with control, accordingly in the Ist alternative on 15% (BAS + Fe+3, Fe+6 + glauconite), in the IInd — on 4% (complex BAS with phosphoric joint in various densities of P200, P1000), the IIIrd — on 8% (microbal specimen «Cellulose destructor» in dilution 1:500). Conclusions. Effective action is established of biologically active specimen which consists of Fe+3, Fe+6 and natural mineral of glauconite in dilution 1:200– 1:1000 on basic indexes of fermentation activity of dung.

---

Key words: dung, cows, hotbed gases, methane, carbonic gas, biologically active specimen, methanogenesis process.

---

References

1. Kutsenko O.M., Pysarenko V.M. (1995). Ahroekolohiia. [Agroecology]. Kyiv: Urozhai, 256 p. [in Ukrainian].
2. Pinchuk V.O. (2015). Emisiia parnykovykh haziv u haluzi tvarynnytstva Ukrainy. [Emissions of greenhouse gases in the field of animal husbandry of Ukraine].Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannia. T. 7, № 1/2. P. 115–118. [in Ukrainian].
3. Khodorchuk V.Ia., Aliieva I.V., Martkoplishvili M.M. (2014). Minimizatsiia emisii parnykovykh haziv u silskomu hospodarstvi. [Minimization of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture]. Ahrar. visn. Pivdnia. № 1. P. 168–173. [in Ukrainian].
4. Binkovska H.V., Shanina T.P. (2016). Otsinka obsiahiv vykydiv parnykovykh haziv u systemakh povodzhennia z silskohospodarskymy vidkhodamy Odeskoi oblasti. [Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions in the systems of handling agricultural wastes in Odessa region]. Visn. KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. V. 14. P. 91 – 97. [in Ukrainian].
5. Broucek J. (2014). Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: A review. J. of Envi­ronmental Protection. V. 5. P. 1482 – 1493.
6. Eckard R.J., Grainger C., de Klein C.A.M. (2010). Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review. Livestock Science. V. 130. P. 47 – 56.
7. Khaliman I.O. (2013). Ekolohichni aspekty metanovoho brodinnia vidkhodiv tvarynnytstva. [Environmental aspects of methane fermentation of animal waste]. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetutu.. № 3. P. 168–172. [in Ukrainian].
8. Zhukorskyi O.M., Nykyforuk O.V., Bol­tyk N.P. (2015). Emisiia parnykovykh haziv vid koriv na fermakh iz vyrobnytstva moloka. [Greenhouse gas emissions from cows on farms milk production]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. № 5. P. 45 – 48. [in Ukrainian].
9. Shatskyi V.V., Skliar O.H., Skliar R.V., Solodka O.O. (2013). Vplyv struktury substratu na vykhid biohazu pry metanovomu zbrodzhuvanni. [Influence of substrate structure on biogas output at methane fermentation]. Pr. TDATU. V. 13. T. 3. P. 3–12. [in Ukrainian].
10. Demchuk M.V., Reshetnyk A.O., Laiter-Moskaliuk S.V. (2010). Problemy utylizatsii hnoiu v suchasnomu tvarynnytstvi. [Problems of manure utilization in modern animal husbandry]. Nauk. visn. Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetutu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho. T. 12, № 3 (4). P. 188 – 195. [in Ukrainian].
11. Chibisova N.V. (1999). Praktikum po ekologicheskoj himii: uchebn. posobie. [Workshop on Environmental Chemistry: A Training Manual]. Kaliningrad. 94 p. [in Russian].