04. Quality indicators of natural polyflorous honey in different native zones of Carpathian region
https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201807-04
Rivis J. F., Koval's'kyj Ju. V., Saranchuk I. I., Klym O. Ja.
Pages: 27-31.
Full article:
Key words: bees, native zones of Carpathian region, quality indicators of natural polyflorous honey.
Pages: 27-31.
Full article:
Abstract
The purpose. To determine basic quality indicators of natural polyflorous honey selected from beehives, placed in different native zones of Carpathian region. Methods. In samples of natural polyflorous honey selected according to National standard DSTU 4497:2005, developed in NSC «I. Prokopovich Institute of beekeeping», the following basic quality indicators were determined: diastasis number and content of deoxidiziry sugars, proline, hydroxymethylfurfurol, lead, cadmium, arsenic. Results. In natural polyflorous honey, sampled from beehives, placed in forest-steppe zone of Carpathian region, most considerably varies diastasis number and content of recovering sugars, proline, hydroxymethylfurfurol and toxic mineral elements. High diastasis number of honey specifies greater intensity of fission in them of polysugars -and -amylase. High content of deoxidiziry sugars and proline in honey confirms their natural origin. Low level of hydroxymethylfurfurol in honey testifies, first of all, to their prolonged keeping ability. It can be confirmed by urbanization and industrialization of that native zone. Conclusions. Basic quality indicators aggravated most of all (in 1,32 – 45 times) in natural polyflorous honey, sampled from beehives, placed in forest-steppe zone of Carpathian region.Key words: bees, native zones of Carpathian region, quality indicators of natural polyflorous honey.
References
- Bezzubov L.P. (1975). Himiya zhirov. Moskva: Pishevaya promyshlennost. [Chemistry of fats]. 279. [in Russian].
- Bodnarchuk L.I., Musialkovska A.O. (2008). Mineralnyi sklad produktiv bdzhilnytstva. [Mineral composition of beekeeping products]. Pasika. 9:17–19. [in Ukrainian].
- Aganin A.V. (1985). Opredelenie vlazhnosti meda. [Determination of the moisture content of honey]. Pchelovodstvo.. 4:30–31. [in Russian].
- Polishchuk V.P. (2001). Bdzhilnytstvo. [Apiculture]. Lviv: Ukrainskyi pasichnyk. 296. [in Ukrainian].
- Kovalskyi Yu.V., Kyryliv Ya.I. (2016). Tekhnolohiia oderzhannia produktiv bdzhilnytstva. [Technology of production of beekeeping products]. Lviv. 322 p. [in Ukrainian].
- Kuzmina K. (2008). Protymikrobnu diiu maie lyshe naturalnyi med. [Antimicrobial action has only natural honey]. Pasika. 12:P. 26–27. [in Ukrainian].
- Perugini M., Manera M., Grotta L. et al. (2011). Heavy Metal (Hg, Cr, Cd, and Pb) Contamination in Urban Areas and Wildlife Reserves: Honeybees as Bioindicators. Biol Trace Elem. Res. 140:170–176.
- Muliavko N.O. (1994). Pokaznyky yakosti medu. [Indices of quality of honey]. Bdzhilnytstvo. Kyiv: Urozhai. 21:73–76. [in Ukrainian].
- Lavrenov V.K. (2004). Vse o mede i drugih produktah pchelovodstva: Enciklopediya. [All about honey and other beekeeping products: Encyclopedia] Moskva: AST; Doneck: Stalker. 256. [in Russian].
- Med naturalnyi. Tekhnichni umovy: DSTU 4497:2005. (Chynnyi vid 2007-01-01). [Honey is natural. Specifications: DSTU 4497: 2005. (Effective from 2007-01-01)] Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 2007. 21 s. (Natsionalnyi standart Ukrainy). [in Ukrainian].