09. Problems of potential weediness of soil in Ukraine

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201808-09
Ivaschenko O. O., Remeniuk S. O., Ivaschenko O. O.
Pages: 58-68.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To determine the level of potential weediness of plowlands in the main soil-climatic zones of the country. Methods. Field and laboratory — sampling of soil on fields of Kyiv, Cherkasy, Vinnytsia, Poltava, Sumy, Kropyvnytskyi, Mykolayiv, Odesa, Rivne and Ternopil oblasts for selection and determination of seeds of weeds. On fields of every soil-climatic zone in the autumn, after harvesting and execution of basic soil cultivation, they took samples from an arable layer (0–30 cm) and from depth (0–10 cm) (from surface soil layers germinates more than 90% of sprouts of weeds). Results. From seeds sampled in soils of Polissia, as a result of sprouting during 20 days 7,7% of different sorts of weeds germinated on the average. Accordingly on the average 1887 plants of weeds are capable to germinate on plowlands on the area of 1 m2 from the depth of 0–10 cm. In Forest-steppe from the washed off seeds of different sorts 8,2% germinate on the average. 4674 pieces of plants of weeds are capable to germinate on square meter of plowlands from the depth of 0–10 cm. 5,9% (or 2242 pieces/m2) of seeds of different sorts of weeds, washed off of soil of Steppe, formed plantlets and sprouts during sprouting for 20 days. Conclusions. Contemporary agrarian production for successful operation and effective use of plowlands demands development and realization of system of complex measures of gradual level recession of potential weed infestation of soil by seeds of weeds and organs of their vegetative reproduction, in view of specificity of each field.


Key words: weeds, stores of seeds, soil, lowering weediness, field.



References
  1. Pflanzenwelt der Erde. Von Einem Autoren kolektiv unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Franz Fukarek Urania — Verlag — Jena Berlin, 1982. 134 p.
  2. N'jumen A. (1989). Legkie nashej planety. Vlazhnyj tropicheskij les naibolee ugrozhaemyj biocenoz na Zemle. [The lungs of our planet. Wet tropical forest the most threatened biocenosis on Earth]. Moskva: Mir. 334 p. [in Russian].
  3. Mirkin B.M. (1981). Teorija i praktika fitocenologii. [Theory and practice of phytocenology ]. Moskva: Znanie. 64 p. [in Russian].
  4. Mirkin B.M. (1986). O tipah jekologo-cenoticheskih strategij u rastenij. [On the types of ecologo-cenotic strategies in plants]. Zhurnal obshhej biologii. V. XI. P. 603–613. [in Russian].
  5. Hrodzynskyi A.M. (Ed.). (1989). Likarski roslyny: Entsyklopedychnyi dovidnyk. [Medicinal plants: Encyclopedic guide]. Kyiv: Hol. red. URE im. M.P. Bazhana. 542 p. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Fukarek F. (1982). Rastitel'nyj mir Zemli. [Flora of the Earth]. V. II. Moskva: Mir. 318 p.
  7. Shishkin B.K. (Ed.). (1963). Botanicheskij atlas. [Botanical atlas]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo sel'skohozjajstvennoj literatury. 498 p. [in Russian].
  8. Silvertown J.W. (1982). Introduction to plant population ecology. Z.; N.V.; Zougman. 209 p.
  9. Solomaha V.A., Solomaha T.D. (1989). Floristicheskie osobennosti cenoidikacionnyh kompleksov sornjakov pahotnyh zemel' ravninnoj chasti Ukrainy. Problemy izuchenija sinantropnoj flory SSSR. [Floristic features of the pricing of weeds in the plains of Ukraine. The problems of studying the synanthropic flora of the USSR]. P. 8–10. [in Russian].
  10. Putnam A.R. Allelochemicals from plant as herbicides. Weed Technol. 1988. № 2.4. P. 510–518.
  11. Telitchenko M.M., Ostroumova S.A. (1990). Vvedenie v problemy biohimicheskoj jekologii. [Introduction to the problems of biochemical ecology]. Moskva: Nauka. 286 p. [in Russian].
  12. Alignier A., Bretagnolle V., Petit S. (2012). Spatial pat­tern so weeds alongag radien to flands cape complexity. Basic and Applied Ecology. 13. P. 328–337.
  13. Armengot L., Blanco-Moreno J.M, Barberi P. et al. (2016). Tillage as a driver of change in weed communities: a functional perspective. Agriculture. Eco­systems and Environment. 222. P. 276–285.
  14. Bellanger S., Gullenmin J. P., Touzeau S., Darmency H. (2015). Variation of inbreeding depression in Centaurea cyanis L., a self-incompatible species. Flora. 212. P. 24–29.
  15. Gaba S. (2016). Determination of fatty acids content, global antioxidant activity and energy value of weed seeds from farmland in France. Weed Research. 56. P. 78–95.
  16. Durr C., Dickie J.B., Yang X.Y., Pritchard H.W. (2015). Ranges of critical temperature and water potential values for the germination of species worldwide: contribution to a seed trait database. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 200. P. 222–232.
  17. Vitrihovskij P.I. (1984). Nekotorye itogi i problemy minimalizacii obrabotki pochvy. [Some results and problems of minimizing tillage]. Sel'skoe hozjajstvo za rubezhom. No. 7. P. 8–12. [in Russian].
  18. Sizov A.I., Lunev I.I., Jakovchenko V.P. (1989). Intensivnye tehnologii i ohrana pochv ot zagrjaznenija pesticidami. [Intensive technologies and soil protection from pesticide pollution]. Zemledelie. No. 9. P. 40–42. [in Russian].
  19. Veselovskyi I.V., Lysenko A.K., Manko Yu.P. (1988). Atlas-vyznachnyk burianiv. [Atlas is a determinant of weeds]. Kyiv: Urozhai. 70 p. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Ivashchenko O.O. (2009). Buriany v posivakh — problema masshtabna. [Weeds in crops - the problem is large]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn. No. 9. P. 2–4. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Ivashchenko O.O., Kunak V.D. (1998). Buriany, chomu zrostaie potentsiina zasmichenist poliv. [Weeds, why the potential burrowing of fields increases]. Zakhyst roslyn. No. 3. P. 10–12. [in Ukrainian].
  22. Ivashchenko O.O. (2001). Buriany v ahrofitotsenozakh. Problemy praktychnoi herbolohii. [Weeds in agrophytocenoses. Problems of practical herbology]. Kyiv: Svit. 234 p. [in Ukrainian].
  23. Bayer D.E. (1985). Mechanisms for weeds ed sur­vival. Pric. Ann. Calif. Weed Conf. 1(37). P. 50–52.
  24. Trybel S.O. (Ed.). (2001). Metodyka vyprobuvannia i zastosuvannia pestytsydiv. [Method of testing and application of pesticides]. Kyiv: Svit. 447 p. [in Ukrainian].