11. Influence of compaction and fertilization of soil on use of nutrients and productivity of spring barley

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201808-11
Uvarenko K. Ju.
Pages: 76-81.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To determine influence of soil compaction, as well as efficiency of action and after-action of fertilizers on use of nutrients from soil and productivity of intense and half-intense varieties of spring barley. Methods. Field small-plot, laboratory-analytical, mathematical-statistical. Results. Influence of firmness of soil and fertilizers on coefficient of use of nutrients by plants from soil and productivity of varieties of barley is determined. It is established that intense varieties of barley use on 6% more nitrogen and phosphorus, and on 11% — of potassium, than half-intensive ones. Conditions of watering have essential influence upon conditions of absorbing nutrients and formation of yield. Deficiency of moisture promotes lowering of use of nutrients from soil in 2–3 times in comparison to their use in excessively wet conditions. At overmoistening the greatest productivity (73,5 and 69 c/hectare of intense and half-intense varieties) have been gained at optimum firmness and at importation of N45P45K45. In conditions of drought year the greatest productivity of spring barley (intense variety — 18,5, half-intense — 23,5 c/hectare) is generated on the background of after-effect of N90P90K90 at optimum soil compaction. The downdrift of productivity of cultivated crop is registered at augmentation of soil compaction up to 1,4 g/cm3. Conclusions. As a result of experimental researches it is established that due to importation of the heightened doses of fertilizers into combination to optimum firmness of soil it is possible to gain heavy yield of spring barley. The compacted soil negatively influences growth and development of cultivated plants, hampers use of nutrients from soil and reduces productivity of cultivated varieties of the crop.


Key words: firmness of soil, coefficient of use of nutrients, variety, productivity.



References
  1. Medvedev V.V., Lyndina T.E. , Laktionova T.N. (2004). Plotnost' slozhenija pochv (geneticheskij, jekologicheskij i agronomicheskij aspekt). [Density of soil composition (genetic, ecological and agronomic aspect)]. Har'kov: 13-ja tipografija, 244 p. [in Russian].
  2. McKenzie R.H. (2010). Agricultural soil compaction: causes and management. Agri-Facts. P. 1–10.
  3. Lipiec J., Stepniewski W. (1995). Effect of soil com­paction and tillage systems on uptake and losses of nutrients. Soil and Tillage Res. V. 35. P. 37–52.
  4. Kuk Dzh. U. (1970). Regulirovanie plodorodija pochvy. [Regulation of soil fertility]. Moskva: Kolos. 514 p. [in Russian].
  5. Hospodarenko H.M. (2015). Ahrokhimiia. [Agrochemicals]. Kyiv: TOV «SIK HRUP UKRAINA», 376 p. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Zahorodniuk P.V. (2002). Efektyvnist mineralnykh dobryv pry vyroshchuvanni yaroho yachmeniu ta yikh vplyv na pozhyvnyi rezhym temno-siroho opidzolenoho gruntu. [Efficiency of mineral fertilizers in the growth of spring barley and their effect on the nutritional regime of dark gray podzolized soils]. Naukovyi visnyk NAU. Kyiv. No. 48. P. 253–257. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Zhurbitskij Z.I., Lavrichenko V.M. (1979). O konstantnosti sootnoshenij jelementov pitanija, pogloshhaemyh rastenijami, pri regulirovanii faktorov vneshnej sredy v iskusstvennyh uslovijah. [On the constancy of the ratios of nutrients absorbed by plants, in the regulation of environmental factors in artificial conditions]. Agrohimija. No. 10. P. 69–74. [in Russian].
  8. Petukhova I.A., Riabchun V.K., Muzafarova V.A., Padalka O.I. (2016). Otsinka sortiv yachmeniu yaroho dlia krupianoho napriamu vykorystannia za kompleksom tsinnykh hospodarskykh oznak v umovakh Lisostepu Ukrainy. [Estimation of varieties of barley for commercial use in a complex of valuable economic features in the conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Henetychni resursy roslyn. No. 18. P. 31–40. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kozachenko M.R., Vasko N.I., Naumov O.H. (2014). Sorty yachmeniu dlia suchasnoho silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva. [Barley sorts for modern agricultural production]. Visnyk TsNZ APV Kharkivskoi oblasti. No. 17. P. 97–100. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Lialko V.I., Yelistratova L.O., Apostolov O.A. (2015). Porivnialni doslidzhennia posukhy za suputnykovymy ta meteorolohichnymy indeksamy na prykladi 2007 roku v Ukraini. [Popibhialbhi doclidzhehhia nocyxy za cynythykobymy ta meteopolorichhymy ihdekcamy ha npykladi 2007 poky b Ykpaihi]. Kosmichna nauka i tekhnolohiia. V. 21. No. 3. P. 27–30. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Barvinskyi A.V. (2003). Ahrofizychni vlastyvosti sirykh lisovykh gruntiv u zviazku z systematychnym zastosuvanniam dobryv ta meliorantiv. [Agrophysical properties of gray forest soils due to the systematic application of fertilizers and meliorants]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. No. 1. P. 91–95. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Medvediev V.V., Lypets Ye., Lyndina T.E. (2002). Vplyv shchilnosti gruntu na zasvoiennia silskohospodarskymy kulturamy pozhyvnykh elementiv. [Influence of soil density on the assimilation of nutrient elements by agricultural crops]. News of agrarian sciences. No. 5. P. 11–15. [in Ukrainian].