Musiienko M. M., Batsmanova L. M., Pys'menna Ju. M., Kondratiuk T. O., Taran N. Ju., Beregova T. V.
Pages: 27-34.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To study effect of bacterial isolates Bacillus subtilis 537/B1 upon change in lectin activity and content of malonic dialdehyde (MDC) in plantlets of winter wheat of different on resistance varieties — Myronivska 808 and Renan — affected by causal organism of eyespot spot Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron) Deighton. Methods. Preparation of lectin-containing extract was carried out by Lutsyk method. Lectin activity was determined by erythro-agglutination method. Protein content in lectin-containing extracts was determined by Bradford method. Level of generated MDC as a product of lipid peroxidation was estimated according to Dhindsa and Matowe. Statistical analysis of gained results was made by method of dispersion analysis in the program Microsoft Excel. Reliability of variance between alternatives was evaluated by Student t-test number at P≤0,05. Results. It is shown that treatment of plantlets of winter wheat of varieties Myronivska 808 and Renan wth bacterial isolates of B. subtilis 537/B1 in pathogeny conditions promoted the maximum growth of lectin activity. And for variety Myronivska 808 such treatment was more efficient. It was established that oxidative stress developed both in sprouts and seeds infected with conidia suspension of pathogenic fungi and suspension of B.subtilis 537/B1 bacterial isolates. That was confirmed by intensification of lipid peroxidation (LPO) processes. Conclusions. Treatment of plantlets and seeds of winter wheat of varieties Myronivska 808 and Renan with bacterial isolates B. subtilis 537/B1 had protecting character under the action of eyespot causal agent. The obtained data may become a basis for the further researches and consideration of opportunities for creation of new efficient biofungicides on the basis of B. subtilis 537/B1 for protection cereal crops against causal organisms of different diseases.

---

Key words: PR-proteins, Bacillus subtilis 537/B1, Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, pathogenesis, MDC content, lectin activity.

---

References

1. Compant S., Duffy B., Nowak J. et al. (2005). Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Applied and environmental microbiology. 71(9). P. 4951 – 4959.
2. Kilian M., Steiner U., Krebs B. et al. (2000). FZB24®Bacillus subtilis-mode of action of a microbial agent enhancing plant vitality. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer. 1(00). P. 1.
3. Porcel R., Zamarreño Á.M., García-Mina J.M., Aroca R. (2014). Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in Bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants. BMC plant biology. V. 14. P. 36. Doi 10.1186/1471-2229-14-36.
4. Van Loon L.C. (2007). Plant responses to plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria. In New Perspectives and Approaches in Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Research. Springer, Dordrecht. V. 119. P. 243 – 254.
5. Pieterse C.M., Zamioudis C., Berendsen R.L. et al. (2014). Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual review of phytopathology. V. 52. P. 347 – 375.
6. Pieterse C.M., Van der Does D., Zamioudis C. et al. (2012). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. V. 28. P. 1 – 28.
7. Butaye K.M., Goderis I.J., Wouters P.F. et al. (2004). Stable high-level transgene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana using gene silencing mutants and matrix attachment regions. The plant journal. 39(3). P. 440 – 449.
8. Pohorila N. F., Surzhyk L.M., Pohorila Z.O. (2002). Novitnie testuvannia lektyniv roslyn. [Newest testing of plant lectins]. Ukrainskyi botanichnyi zhurnal. 59 (2). P. 217 – 220. [In Ukrainian].
9. Lutsyk M.D., Panasiuk E.N., Lutsyk A.D. (1981). Lektyny (monohrafiia). [Lectins (monograph)]. Lviv: Vyshcha shkola. 156 p. [In Ukrainian].
10. Bradford M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry. 72(1 – 2). P. 248 – 254.
11. Dhindsa R.S., Matowe W. (1981). Drought tolerance in two mosses: correlated with enzymatic defence against lipid peroxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 32(1). P. 79 – 91.
12. De Vleesschauwer D., Höfte M. (2009). Rhizobacteriainduced systemic resistance. Advances in botanical research. 51. P. 223 – 281.
13. Melentʹev A.I. (2007). Aehrobnye sporoobrazuyushchie bakterii Bacillus Coh. v agroehkosistemakh. [Aerobic spore-forming bacteria Bacillus Coh. in agroecosystems]. Moskva: Nauka. 147 p. [in Russian].
14. Aktuganov G.EH., Galimzyanova N.F., Melentʹev A.I., Kuzʹmina L.YU. (2007). Vnekletochnye gidrolazy shtamma Bacillus sp. 739 i ikh uchastie v lizise kletochnykh stenok mikromitsetov. [Extracellular hydrolases of the strain Bacillus sp. 739 and their participation in the lysis of the cell walls of micromycetes]. Mikrobiologiya. 76(4). P. 471 – 479. [in Russian].
15. Verhagen B.W., Trotel-Aziz P., Couderchet M. et al. (2009). Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany. 61(1). P. 249 – 260.
16. Pastor V., Luna E., Mauch-Mani B. et al. (2013). Primed plants do not forget. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 94. P. 46 – 56.
17. Torres M.A. (2010). ROS in biotic interactions. Physiologia Plantarum. 138(4). P. 414 – 429.
18. Pozo M.J., Van Der Ent S., Van Loon L.C., Pieterse C.M. (2008). Transcription factor MYC2 is involved in priming for enhanced defense during rhizobacteriainduced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist. 180(2). P. 511 – 523.
19. Falardeau J., Wise C., Novitsky L., Avis T.J. (2013). Ecological and mechanistic insights into the direct and indirect antimicrobial properties of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptides on plant pathogens. Journal of chemical ecology. 39(7). P. 869 – 878.
20. Wang X., Wang J., Jin P., Zheng Y. (2013). Investigating the efficacy of Bacillus subtilis SM21 on controlling Rhizopus rot in peach fruit. International journalof food microbiology. 164(2 – 3). P. 141 – 147.