Nychyk S. A., Mandygra S. S., Mushtuk I. Ju., Ajshpur O. Je., Sytiuk M. P.
Pages: 113-119.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To study epizootic situation concerning classical swine fever (CSF) in the world in 2012-2017 and to determine major factors which can promote spread of infection to Ukraine. Methods. Data of official veterinary statistics, materials of scientific publications and Internet-resource WOAH (http://www.oie.int) are used. Reports from 243 countries of the world including Europe (55), Asia (46), Africa (59), America (52) and Oceania (31) are analyzed. Results. It is established that for the last 6 years CSF flashes were registered in 30 countries (12,3%) of 243 analyzed; in 92 countries (37,9%) there were no revealed flashes of disease for the accounting period; 57 countries (23,5%) did not give information on CSF; and in 64 countries (26,3%) CSF had never registered. The greatest amount of CSF flashes was registered in countries of Asia (15), Central and South America (8), a little bit less in East Europe (3) and Africa. According to WOAH countries of Northern America, Europe (22), Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia and Japan are officially recognized as CSF free. In Ukraine epizootic CSF was liquidated in 1997, however sporadic events of disease among wild boars still occur. Major factors which can lead to spread of CSF to our country include: migration of wild boars and their contact to house pigs, international trade, and also vaccination against CSF. Key tool of monitoring and prevention of emersion of new CSF flashes is duly and effective diagnostics. Conclusions. During 2012-2017 CSF flashes were registered in 30 countries, in particular in territory of Asia, Central and South America, and also East Europe and Africa. Northern America, the most part of Europe (22), Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia and Japan are officially recognized as CSF free. Epizootic situation on CSF in Ukraine is concerning stable. For the last 6 years only one CSF flash had been registered among wild boars. However there is a high risk of repetitive occurrence of the disease.

---

Key words: classical swine fever, CSF, pigs, epizootic situation.

---

References

1. Makapob B.B., Gpybblj B.A., Gpyzdeb L.H., Cyxapeb O.Y. (2012). Cnycok MEB y tpahcrpahychhe yhfektsyy zhybothblx: mohorpafyia. Bladymyp: FGBY «BHYYZZh», 162 p. [In Russian].
2. Gregg D. (2002). Update on classical swine fever (hog cholera). J. of Swine Health and Production. V. 10 (1). P. 33–37.
3. Moennig V., Floegel-Niesmann G., Greiser-Wilke I. (2003). Clinical signs and epidemiology of classical swine fever: a review of new knowledge. Veterinary J. V. 165. P. 11–20.
4. Klestova Z.S. (2016). Emerdzhentni virusni zakhvoriuvannia tvaryn ta prohnozuvannia bioryzykiv. [Emergency viral animal diseases and prediction of biorhyzics]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia. Vyp. 29. P. 117–131. [In Ukrainian].
5. Penrith M.L., Vosloo W., Mather C. (2011). Classical Swine Fever (Hog Cholera): Review of Aspects Relevant to Control. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. V. 58. P. 187–196.
6. Chapter 2.8.3. (2008). Classical swine fever (hog cholera). OIE Terrestrial Manual. P. 1092–1106.
7. Korniienko L.Ie. (2015). Klasychna chuma svynei: istorychni aspekty, suchasna epizootychna sytuatsiia v sviti ta Ukraini, imunitet i vaktsynoprofilaktyka. [Classical swine fever: historical aspects, current epizootic situation in the world and Ukraine, immunity and vaccine prophylaxis]. Naukovyi visnyk veterynarnoi medytsyny. No 2. P. 5–13. [In Ukrainian].
8. Edwards S., Fukusho A., Lefevre P.C. et al. (2000). Classical swine fever: The global situation. Veterinary Microbiology. V. 73. P. 103–119.
9. Postel A., Moennig V., Becher P. (2013). Classical swine fever in Europe — the current situation. Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift. V. 126 (11–12). P. 468–475.
10. Map of CSF official status. OIE World Organisation for Animal Health Website. 2017. URL http://www.oie.int/animal-health-in-the-world/official-disease-status/classical-swine-fever/mapof-csf-official-status.
11. Mushtuk I.Iu. (2014). Klasychna chuma svynei sered populiatsii dykykh i sviiskykh tvaryn. [Classical swine fever among wild and domestic animals]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia. Vyp. 24. P. 115–119. [In Ukrainian].
12. Sytiuk M.P., Mushtuk I.Iu., Nychyk S.A., Obrazhei A.F. (2012). Obgruntuvannia vidminy vaktsynatsii proty klasychnoi chumy svynei yak holovnoho chynnyka pry vprovadzhenni zakhodiv po eradykatsii. [Justification for the abolition of vaccination against classical swine fever as a major factor in the implementation of eradication measures]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia. Vyp. 21. P. 177–186. [In Ukrainian].
13. Moennig V. (2000). Introduction to classical swine fever: virus, disease and control. Veterinary Microbiology. V. 73, Is. 2–3. P. 93–102.
14. Mandyhra S.S., Muzykina L.M., Ishchenko L.M. et al. (2017). Rozrobka test-systemy dlia dyferentsiinoi diahnostyky afrykanskoi ta klasychnoi chumy svynei metodom ZT-PLR u rezhymi realnoho chasu. [Development of a test system for differential diagnosis of African and classical swine fever by RT-PCR in real-time mode]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia. Vyp. 31. P. 103–111. [In Ukrainian].