Kondratenko S. I., Shabetia O. M., Mogyl'na O. M., Tkalych Ju. V.
Pages: 134-140.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To determine action of mutagen factors on formation of quality attributes determining phenotype of a leaf and to carry out comparative correlation analysis between developing process of quality and quantitative attributes of genotypes of lettuce of mutant origin. Methods. Nonparametric statistics, field assessment, calculation-analytical. Results. Features of action of physical and chemical mutagenesis on phenotypical developing process of quality attributes determining morphology of a leaf of lettuce are fixed. The extent of divergence of developing process of quality attributes depending on action of mutagen factor between target forms and derived from them mutant genotypes is specified. Important correlation for selection process between quality and quantitative attributes at the probed genotypes are established. It is fixed that according to developing process of association marks determining phenotype of leaf blade the most contrast in comparison with initial form were 5 mutant samples which were formed as a result of g-irradiation and treatment of seeds with preparations DMU-1 and DMU-5 before sowing. Conclusions. The probed correlation enable to select highly productive genotypes of lettuce at early stages of ontogenesis of plants on association of quality attributes determining phenotype of leaf blade. Statistically reliable correlation is especially useful between integrated parameter for aggregate of quality attributes «average index for sampling» and level of attribute «amount of leaves on one plant». On the basis of mutant samples of lettuce new high-yielding variety Patriot which exceeded variety-standard Snizhynka on a complex of valuable quantitative attributes is created. Productivity of new variety makes 11,92 t / hectare against 6,14 t / hectare at the standard one. Amount of days for the period from mass shoots up to commodity maturity at new variety makes 17–18, while at variety-standard Snizhynka 20–23 days.

---

Key words: lettuce, blade, quality attributes, induced mutagenesis, correlation.

---

References

1. Yakovenko K.I. (2000). Ovochivnytstvo Ukrainy na porozi KhKhI stolittia. [Vegetable Ukraine on the threshold of the XXI century]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. No 8. P. 21–22. [In Ukrainian].
2. Ruchkin O.V. (1999). Napriam rozvytku vyrobnytstva ta realizatsii produktsii ovochivnytstva i bashtannytstva v Ukraini v umovakh rynku. [The direction of development and production of vegetable and melon products in Ukraine in the market conditions]. Ovochivnytstvo i bashtannytstvo. No 44. P. 3–7. [In Ukrainian].
3. Bondarenko H.L., Yakovenko K.I. (Eds.). (2001). Metodyka doslidnoi spravy v ovochivnytstvi i bashtannytstvi. [Methodology of experimental work in vegetable and melon]. Kharkiv: Osnova. 369 p. [In Ukrainian].
4. Pivovarov V.F., Dobrutskaya E.G. (2000). Ekologicheskie osnovy selektsii i semenovodstva ovoshchnykh kul'tur. [Ecological bases of selection and seed-growing of vegetable cultures]. Moskva. 197 p. [In Russian].
5. Mou B. (2011). Mutations in lettuce improvement. International Journal of Plant Genomics. Article ID 723518, 7 pages. doi:10.1155/2011/723518
6. Huo H., Henry I.M., Coppoolse E.R. (2016). Rapid identification of lettuce seed germination mutants by bulked segregant analysis and whole genome sequencing. The Plant Journal. V. 88/3. doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13267
7. Parry M.A., Madgwick P.J. Bayon C. et al. (2009). Mutation discovery for crop improvement. J. of Experimental Botany. V. 60. P. 2817–2825.
8. Grube R.C., Ochoa O.E. (2005). Comparative genetic analysis of field resistance to downy mildew in lettuce the cultivars «Grand Rapids» and «Ice berg». Euphytica. V. 142. P. 205–215.
9. Delia Marcu, Victoria Cristea, Liviu Daraban. (2012). Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata) seedlings. International J. of Radiotion Biology. October 2012. P. 219–223. doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2013. 734946.
10. Wi S.G., Chung B.Y., Kim J.S. et al. (2007). Effects of gamma irradiation on morphological changes and biological responses in plants. Micron. V. 38. P. 553–564.
11. Horova T.K., Yakovenko K.I. (Eds.). (2001). Suchasni metody selektsii ovochevykh i bashtannykh kultur. [Modern methods of selection of vegetable and melon cultures]. Kharkiv: Osnova. 432 p. [In Ukrainian].
12. Yakovenko K.I. (Ed.). (2001). Suchasni tekhnolohii v ovochivnytstvi. [Modern technologies in vegetable growing ]. Kharkiv: IOB UAAN, 128 p. [In Ukrainian].
13. Leshchuk N.V. (2007). Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv salatu posivnoho (Lactuca sativa L.) na vidminnist, odnoridnist i stabilnist. [Method of conducting examination of varieties of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) for difference, homogeneity and stability]. Okhorona prav na sorty roslyn: ofits. biul. Kyiv: Alefa, Vyp. 3, ch. 2/2007. P. 366–379. [In Ukrainian].
14. Litun P.P., Kyrychenko V.V., Petrenkova V.P. et al. (2009). Systemnyi analiz v selektsii polovykh kultur: navchalnyi posibnyk. [System analysis in field crop selection: tutorial]. Kharkiv: In-t roslynnytstva im. V.Ia. Yurieva UAAN. 351 p. [In Ukrainian].
15. Kondratenko S.I., Mytenko I.M. (2018). Rezultaty selektsiinoi roboty zi stvorennia vysoko adaptyvnykh sortiv salatu posivnoho lystkovoho (Lactuca sativa var. secalina L.). [The results of breeding work on the creation of highly adaptive varieties of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. Secalina L.) salad.]. Visnyk KhNAU. Ser. «Roslynnytstvo, selektsiia i nasinnytstvo, ovochivnytstvo».No 1. P. 113–124. [In Ukrainian].