09. Institutional levers of maintenance of ecological-economic efficiency of agricultural land-use

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201902-09
Butrym O. V., Doroschuk V. V., Komarova N. V., Tereschenko Ju. Je.
Pages: 66-73.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To carry out ecological-economic assessment of efficiency of use of land resources of agricultural purpose in Kyiv oblast in comparison with state of ecological-economic efficiency of land-use at national level and to offer institutional levers of maintenance of its efficiency. Methods. By means of system analysis and synthesis with engaging statistical and correlation analysis with the subsequent demonstration of results and application of graphical method ecological-economic assessment of differences of level of efficiency of use of agrilands in Kyiv oblast from its state at national level is made. On the basis of monographic method generalization of experience of researches of domestic schools of pedology, agroecology is carried out. That may become a basis of the offered directions of institutional improvement of ways of overcoming ecological-economic crisis of agricultural land-use. Results. It is determined that modern organizational-economic approaches to agricultural land-use in Ukraine do not provide its balanced state. Conceptual aspects of maintenance of admissible level agroecological safety of agricultural land-use are specified at commodity production of plant growing and the role of local communities in solution of that problem in view of administrative reform of Ukraine is shown. Significance of heading free economic turnover of ground areas of agricultural purpose is underlined. Conclusions. It is proved that escalation of profits of farms leads to depletion of agricultural potential which descends now in Ukraine, and creates threats to maintenance of comprehensible level of agroecological and food safety. Significance of institutional and economic levers in innovation of organizational-economic conditions of managing is shown. These conditions are aimed at level of agrochemical parameters of qualitative state of soil covering of agrilands, that is an effective direction of maintenance of recovery and conservation of agricultural potential.

Key words: agricultural potential, land resources of agricultural purpose, commodity output of plant growing, agroecological safety, over-all performance, agricultural production, soil covering.

References
  1. Butrym O. V. (Drebot O.I. Ed.). (2018). Teoretyko-metodologichni osnovy formuvannya vnutrishnogo vuglecevogo rynku v konteksti zbalansovanogo rozvytku agrosfery: monografiya. Kyiv: TOV «DIA». 360 p. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Bystryakov I. K., Klynovyj D. V. (2015). Systemne vyznachennya ekonomichnoyi ocinky pryrodnogo bagatstva Ukrayiny. Visnyk Nacionalnoyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny. 8. pp. 49-57. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Ivanov Yu. G., Kochurov B. I. (1987). Pryrodooxrannoe zonyrovanye terrytoryy admynystratyvnoj oblasty. Landshaftnblj analyz pryrodopolzovanyya., pp. 12–19.
  4. Gajduczkyj I. P. (2014). Investuvannya nyzkovuglecevoyi ekonomiky: teoriya, metodologiya, praktyka: monografiya. Kyiv: TOV «Informacijni systemy», pp. 374. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Gajduczkyj P.I., Sabluk P.T., Lupenko Yu.O. et al. (Gajduczkyj P.I. Ed.). (2005). Agrarna reforma v Ukrayini. K. : NNCz IAE. 424 p. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Stupen M., Skorupska O. (2014). Ekonomichni aspekty racionalnogo zemlekorystuvannya silskogospodarskogo pryznachennya. Visnyk Lvivskogo nacionalnogo agrarnogo universytetu. Ser. Ekonomika APK. 21(1). pp. 389–395. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Xloby’stov Ye. V., Zharova L. V. (2010). Problemy instytucionalizaciyi systemy racionalnogo pryrodokorystuvannya ta oxorony navkolyshnogo pryrodnogo seredovyshha /. Markety’ng i menedzhment innovacij. 2. pp. 206-214. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Grassi G., M. Elzen, Andries F. et al. (2012). The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges. Climatic Change. № 115. P. 873 – 881.
  9. George Boody, Vondracek Bruce, David A. Andow, Krinke Mara, Westra John, Zimmerman Julie, Welle Patrick. (2005). Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States. BioScience 55(1), p. 27–38.
  10. Nerbonne B.A., Vondracek B. (2001). Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA. Environ Manage. Jul; 28 (1): 87-99.
  11. Scherr, S. J, S. Shames and R. Friedman. (2013). Defining integrated landscape management for policy makers. Ecoagriculture Policy Focus. – 2016, №. 10. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners. 235 p.
  12. Mainstreaming climate change into rural development policy post 2013. Ana Frelih-Larsen. Ecologic Institute: Science and Policy for a Sustainable World. Berlin, 2016. URL: http://www.ecologic.eu/10439 (date of the recent exploitation: 18.12.2018).
  13. Dobryak D. S., Kuzin N. V. (2016). Udoskonalennya klasyfikaciyi procesiv, shho sprychynyayut degradaciyu zemelnyx ugid. Zbalansovane pry’rodokory’stuvannya. 1. pp. 106–111. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Martyn A. (2011). Rehuliuvannia rynku zemel v Ukraini: [monohrafiia]. Kyiv: Ahrar Media Hrup. 252 p. [in Ukrainian].
  15. Granovska L.M. (2009). Ekologo-zbalansovane pry’rodokory’stuvannya v umovax polifunkcional’nosti tery’torij. Xerson. 417 p. [in Ukrainian].
  16. Yong Jiang, Stephen K. (2017). Swallow. Impact Fees Coupled With Conservation Payments to Sustain Ecosystem Structure: A Conceptual and Numerical Application at the Urban-Rural Fringe. Ecological Economics. p. 136–147.
  17. Hrynova V.M., Shulha H.Iu. (2010). Ekonomika pratsi ta sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: Navch. posib. Rekomendovano MON. K. 310 s. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Roslynnytstvo Ukrainy 2017. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 2018. 222 p. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy 2017. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 2018. 245 p. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Yatsuk I.P. (Ed.). (2017). Naukovi doslidzhennia z monitorynhu ta obstezhennia silskohospodarskykh uhid Ukrainy za rezultatamy X turu (2011–2015 rr.) Kyiv: DU «Instytut okhorony gruntiv Ukrainy». 66 p. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Pro vnesennia zmin do rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 30 hrudnia 2015 r. № 1437. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy, 2016 r., № 24, st. 960. [in Ukrainian].