04. Perspectives of growing some essential oil-bearing plants in South Steppe

Cvydenko L. V., Jezhov V. M.
Pages: 20-24.

Full article: 
Abstract
Aim Result of long-term researches of biological features and economic valuable signs of the 3rd most perspective epoxy-cultures in the conditions of Steppe South. Methods of researches. After the investigated plants conducted ecological and phenological supervision. In a period their mass flowering carried out the account of harvest. Mass part of essential oil was determined by the Ginsberg method. Component composition of essential oil was studied by chromatography of Agilent Technology 6890 N. Results of researches. The set, which is the index of the productive and component composition of essential oil between the cultures grown in Crimea and Kherson, a significant difference is not. Conclusions. In the conditions of Kherson lavender, thyme and hypos are marked by high frost-resistance and drought- resistingness, have a satisfactory amount of essential oil of a kind quality. The investigated plants are fully suitable for industrial growth in the Steppe South.

Keywords: lavender, thyme, ricon, phenological supervisions, economic valuable signs.

References
  1. Arpoklymatycheckyj cnpabochhyk no Xepcohckoj oblacty. – L.: Gydpometyzdat, 1958. – 90 c.
  2. Bochkapeb H.Y. Cobpemehhoe coctoiahye takcohomyy, mopfoloryy y celektsyy labahdbl/H.Y. Bochkapeb, C.B. Zelehtsob//Haych.-texh. biul. Bcepoc. HYY maclychhblx kylbtyp. – 2013. – 2(155—156). – 32 c.
  3. Byzyk A.G.Cpabhytelbhblj fapmakorhoctycheckyj ahalyz tpabbl chebpetsa/A.G.Byzyk, P.A.Jupchehko, A.A.Byhapckyj, G.Y.Byzyk//Becth. Fapmatsyy, 2011. – № 3. – C. 19—25.
  4. Gyhcbepr A.C. Ynposchehhblj cnocob onpedelehyia kolychectba efyphoro macla b efypohocax//Xym.-fapm. npomblshlehhoctb. – 1932. – № 8—9. – C. 326—329.
  5. Docnexob B.A. Metodyka noleboro onblta. – M.: Koloc, 1985. – 351 c.
  6. Epmakob A.M. Ytory y nepcnektybbl byoxymycheckyx yccledobahyj kylbtyphblx pactehyj/A.M. Epmakob, M.Y. Ykohhykob, G.A. Lykobhykoba, H.P. Japosh//Tpydbl no npykl. botahyke, rehetyke y celektsyy. – 1969. – № 41. – Bbln. 1. – C. 326—363.
  7. Gopbyhoba E.O. Byolorycheckye ocobehhocty labahdbl yzkolyctoj npy yhtpodyktsyy b Podmockobbe: abtopef. dyc. ha coyckahye ych. ctenehy kahd. byol. hayk, cnets. 03.00.05, botahyka. – GBC ym. Tsytsyha. – M., 1996. – 16 c.
  8. Mazylb B.I. Doclidzhehhia ximichhoro cklady poclyh podyhy iachotkobi/B.I. Mazylb, B.C. Dolia, B.B. Golobkih, A.B. Cemko//Matepialy 3-i Bceykp. hayk.-npakt. kohf. «Ximiia npypodhyx cnolyk». – Tephonilb, depzh. med. yh-t, 30-31.10.2012. – Tephonilb: Ykpmedkhyra, 2012. – C. 33.
  9. Mladehets M.A. Yccledobahye xymycheckoro coctaba efyphblx macel hekotopblx bydob cemejctba Lamiaceae, kylbtybypyemblx b yclobyiax Zanadhoj Cybypy/M.A. Mladehets, D.B. Dompacheb, B.A. Chepemyshyha//Xymyia pactytelbhoro cblp'ia. – 2012. – № 1. – C. 111—117.
  10. Onahacehko H.E. Pochbbl onblthoro xoziajctba «Hobokaxobckoe» Xepcohckoj oblacty y pekomehdatsyy no yx ylychshehyiu//Goc. Hykytckyj bot. cad. – Jalta, 1995. – 32 c.
  11. Ppypoda Xepcohckoj oblacty. Fyzyko-reorpafycheckyj ochepk. – K.: Fytocotsyotsehtp, 1998. – 119 c.
  12. Pabotiarob B.D. Efypomaclychhble pactehyia y npiahoapomatycheckye kylbtypbl dlia ycnolbzobahyia b fytotepanyy/B.D. Pabotiarob, H.H. Bakoba, L.A. Xlblnehko, T.F. Golybeba//Goc. Hykytckyj bot. cad. – Jalta, 1998. – 82 c.
  13. Pabotiarob B.D. Yhtpodyktsyia efypomaclychhblx y npiahoapomatycheckyx pactehyj/B.D. Pabotiarob, B.Y. Mashahob, H.F. Ahdpeeba//Goc. Hykytckyj bot. cad. – Jalta, 1999. – 30 c.
  14. Pabotiarob B.D. Hobble copta apomatycheckyx y lekapctbehhblx pactehyj celektsyy Hykytckoro botahycheckoro cada/B.D. Pabotiarob, L.A. Xlblnehko, L.B. Cbydehko, Y.E. Lorbyhehko//Tpydbl Goc. Hykytckoro bot. cada. – 2011. – Bbln. 133. – C. 5—17.
  15. Celektsyia efypomaclychhblx kylbtyp. Metod. ykazahyia. – Cymfeponolb, 1985. 23 c.
  16. Cehb T.B. Fapmakorhoctycheckoe yzychehye yccona lekapctbehhoro: abtopef. dyc. ha coyckahye ych. ctenehy kahd. fapm. hayk: cnets. 15.00.02., fapmakoxymyia y fapmakorhozyia. – Kypck: roc. med. yh- t, 2007. – 25 c.
  17. Ckynop O.B. Ahalyz npodyktybhocty y dolrobechhocty matochhykob labahdbl//Tabpijcbkyj bich. arpap. hayky. – 2013. – № 1. – C. 48—50.
  18. Xlblnehko L.A. Yzmehchyboctb ochobhblx xoziajctbehho tsehhblx npyzhakob y Hyssopus officinalis/L.A. Xlblnehko, B.D. Pabotiarob, A.H. Shybko//Tez. dokl. Mezhdyhap. haych.-npakt. kohf. k 200- letyiu Hykytckoro bot. cada. – Jalta, HBC—HHTs, 8—12.06.2009. – Cymfeponolb: Tabpyia, 2009. – C. 196—197.
  19. Shybko A.H. Dyhamyka hakonlehyia efyphoro macla y yzmehchyboctb ero komnohehthoro coctaba b techehye cytok y Hyssopus officinalis b yclobyiax npedrophoro Kpblma/A.H. Shybko, Ju.B. Akcehob//Ekocyctembl, yx ontymyzatsyia y oxpaha. – 2011. – № 4. – C. 127—133.
  20. Jennings W. Qualitative Analysis of Flavor and Fragrance Volatiles by Glass Capillary Gas Chromatography/W. Jennings, T. Shibamoto//Academic Press Rapid Manuscript Reproduction, 1980. – 472 p.