14. Analysis of approaches to determination of extent of erosive hazard of slope lands

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201608-14
Nazarok P. G.
Pages: 72-76.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. Comparison and analysis of approaches used to determine the levels of erosion dangers, based on the assignment of land to technological groups and with the aid of Mirtskulava Hydromechanical Erosion Model (HEM). Methods. Geoinformational, mathematical- and-statistical. Results. In soil protection rationing of anthropogenic load on the technological groups of lands is a common practice. In this case, the only criterion for the selection of such groups is the angle of the earth surface. At the moment, the valid State Standard for calculation of the potential losses of soil is the one with the help of HEM. This Standard takes into account the basic meteorological, geomorphological, hydrological and soil indices, that determine the amount of potential losses of soil, and makes it possible to make informed design decisions in soil conservation. Conclusions. The assignment of land to the technological group has the features of a quality procedure that does not allow reasonable planning of crop rotation and agrotechnical tools for erosion- safe use of land. The main problem that occurs while using the HEM is the accuracy of input arguments. Their incorrect input leads to a multiple increase (decrease) of predictive values. Therefore there is a need to create database of reliable values of arguments for the erosive event scenarios.

Key words: slope soils, hydromechanical model of erosion by T.E. Mirtshulavy, erosion-hazardous lands.

References
  1. Bulyhin S.Iu. Otsinka heohrafichnoho seredovyshcha ta optymizatsiia zemlekorystuvannia/S.Iu. Bulyhin, Yu.V. Dumin, M.V. Kutsenko. — Kh.: TOV «Svitlo zi skhodu», 2002. — 168 s.
  2. DSTU 7904:2015 Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennia potentsiinoi zahrozy erozii pid vplyvom doshchiv. 3. Evdokymova T.Y. Pochvennaia s'emka/T.Y. Evdokymova. — M.: Yzd-vo MHU, 1987. — 271 s.
  3. Ynstruktsyia po opredelenyiu raschetnykh hydrolohycheskykh kharakterystyk pry proektyrovanyy protyvoerozyonnykh meropryiatyi na Evropeiskoi terrytoryy SSSR. — L.: Hydrometeoyzdat, 1979. — 62 s.
  4. Kutsenko M.V. Heosystemni osnovy rehuliuvannia eroziino-akumuliatyvnykh protsesiv: heomorfosystemnyi aspekt/M.V. Kutsenko. — Kh.: KP «Miska drukarnia», 2012. — 320 s.
  5. Metodycheskye rekomendatsyy po uchetu poverkhnostnoho stoka y smyva pochv pry yzuchenyy vodnoi erozyy. — L.: Hydrometeoyzdat, 1975. — 88 s.
  6. Myrtskhulava Ts.E. Ynzhenernye metody rascheta y prohnoza vodnoi erozyy/Ts.E. Myrtskhulava. — M.: Kolos, 1970. — 240 s.
  7. Myrtskhulava Ts.E. Vodnaia erozyia pochv/Ts.E. Myrtskhulava. — Tbylysy: Metsnyereba, 2000. — 420 s.
  8. Morhun F.T. Pochvozashchytnoe zemledelye/F.T. Morhun, N.K. Shykula, A.H. Tararyko. — K.: Urozhai, 1988. — 256 s.
  9. Nakaz 02.10.2013 № 395 «Pro zatverdzhennia metodychnykh rekomendatsii shchodo rozroblennia skhem zemleustroiu i tekhniko-ekonomichnykh obgruntuvan vykorystannia ta okhorony zemel administratyvnoterytorialnykh odynyts»//Zemlevporiad. visn. — 2013. — № 10. — S. 46–51.
  10. Nakaz 02.10.2013 № 396 «Pro zatverdzhennia Metodychnykh rekomendatsii shchodo rozroblennia proektiv zemleustroiu, shcho zabezpechuiut ekolohoekonomichne obgruntuvannia sivozminy ta vporiadkuvannia uhid»//Zemlevporiad. visn. — 2013. — № 10. — S. 52–63.
  11. Pochvy Ukrayny y povyshenye ykh plodorodyia; pod red. N.Y. Polupana. — K.: Urozhai, 1988. — T. 2. — 296 s.
  12. Spravochnyk po pochvozashchytnomu zemledelyiu; pod red. Y.N. Bezruchko, L.Ia. Mylchevskoi. — K.: Urozhai, 1990. — 280 s.
  13. Statystychnyi biuleten «Posivni ploshchi silskohospodarskykh kultur pid urozhai».
  14. Surmach H.P. Relefoobrazovanye, formyrovanye lesostepy, sovremennaia erozyia y protyvoerozyonnye meropryiatyia/H.P. Surmach. — Volhohrad, 1992. — 174 s.
  15. Wall G.J. 2002. RUSLE-CAN - Équation universelle révisée des pertes de sol pour application au Canada. Manuel pour lévaluation des pertes de sol causées par lérosion hydrique au Canada/G.J. Wall, D.R. Coote, E.A. Pringle et al. — Direction générale de la recherche, Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada, No de la contribution AAC2244F, 117 p.