10. Ecological and tech­no­logical сontrol over the washing and sanitizing means in milk branch

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201706-10
Zhukors'kyj O. M., Kryvohyzha Je. M.
Pages: 61-64.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To analyze the content of active matters in washing and sanitizing means and to evaluate levels of their receipt into environment after sanitization of milking equipment and cisterns of milk lorries. Methods. Calculation. Results. Under the developed formulas the level is determined of receipt into environment of spent solutions of some washing and sanitizing means which are used in milk branch. Conclusions. 142,4 tons of chemicals per year are spoiled into environment at use in private facilities, dairy-commercial farms with a livestock up to 10 thousand cows, and milk factories for cleaning 20 cisterns of milk lorries of the following washing means: Vimol, Origami Golden, Pur Power Lemon, Roko Agro A, Sidmax, Tesol ME and Zhavel-Kleid. That can negatively influence ecosystems.


Key words: washing-sanitizing means, sanitization, milking equipment, environment.



References
  1. Fagan E.P., Betoli V., Barros M.A.F. (2005). Evaluation and implementation of good pratices in main points of microbiological contamination in milk production. Semina : Ciências Agrárias, 26 (1):83—92.
  2. Jones G.M. (2009). Cleaning and Sanitizing Milking Equipment. Publications (Virginia Cooperative Extension), 400—404:1—4. Available at: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-400/404-400.html.
  3. Reinemann D.J., Wolters G., Billon P., Lind O. Rasmussen M.D. (2009). Review of practices for cleaning and sanitation of milking machines. Bulletin-International Dairy Federation, 381:4—19.
  4. Zhukors'kyy, O.M., Kryvokhyzha Ye.M. (2016). Otsinyuvannya rivnya nadkhodzhennya vidprats'ovanykh rozchyniv myyno-dezinfikuyuchykh zasobiv dlya doyil'noho ustatkuvannya na fermakh u dovkillya [Evaluation of the level of ingress of used solutions detergents disinfectants means for milking and diary equipment on a farm in the natural environment]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyy byuleten' IT NAAN [Scientific and technical bulletin of Institute of Animal of NAAS], 115:75—82 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Kolber E. (1990). Detergents, the Consumer and the Environment. Chemistry & Industry, 6:179—181.
  6. Perry R., Kirk P.W.W., Stephenson T., Lester J.N. (1984). Environmental Aspects of the use of NTA as a Detergent Builder. Water Research, 18 (3):255—276.
  7. Feisthauer N., Sibley P., Burke S. Kaushik N. (2004). A review of the toxicity of detergents and its formulation components on aquatic organisms. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Science, 28:223—297.
  8. Scott M.J., Jones, M.N. (2000). The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1508:235—251.
  9. Dettenkofer M., Spencer R.C. (2007). Importance of environmental decontamination — a critical view. Journal of Hospital Infection, 65 (2):55—57.
  10. Boillot C., Perrodin Y. (2008). Joint-action ecotoxicity of binary mixtures of glutaraldehyde and surfactants used in hospitals: Use of the Toxicity Index model and isoblogram representation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 71 (1):252—259.