03. Efficiency of methods of recreation, fertilizing and utilization of meadow lands

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201707-03
Kurgak V. G., Voloshyn V. M.
Pages: 17-21.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To determine influence of methods of recreation, fertilizing and utilization of meadow lands upon botanical compound, productivity and efficiency of growing grass stands on grey forest soils. Methods. Field, laboratory, mathematical-and-statistical. Results. It is fixed that the most efficient method of recreation of meadow lands is sowing of legume-grass mixtures with lucerne. That ensured the highest efficiency. Importation of N140 for legume-cereal grass stands decreased content of leguminous ingredients and was ineffective. For cereal grass stand and old lands such importation increased productivity in 1,8—2,0 times. Conclusions. Among varied grass stands in the alternative without fertilization the most productive one is lucerne-cereal grass stand, which at 2-hay cutting ensures the yield for 1 hectare of 8,10 tons of dry matter and 5,13 t/hectare of useful units. At 4-hay cutting it ensures 7,41 and 6, 35 t/hectare accordingly, that in 2,1 — 2,3 times more in comparison with seeded cereal grass stand. The level of accumulation of symbiotic nitrogen by lucerne made 142 — 154 kg/hectare.

Key words: efficiency, meadow lands, recreation, grass stand, botanical compound, fertilizing, utilization.

References
  1. Kuksin M.V. Stvorennia i ratsionalne vykorystannia kulturnykh pasovyshch/M.V. Kuksin. — K. : Urozhai, 1973. — 276 s.
  2. Bohovin A.V. Trav’ianysti bioheotsenozy, yikhnie polipshennia ta ratsionalne vykorystannia/A.V. Bohovin, I.T. Sliusar, M.K. Tsarenko. — K. : Ahrarna nauka, 2005. — 360 s.
  3. Makarenko P.S. Lukivnytstvo/P.S. Makarenko, H.I. Demydas, O.M. Koziar. — K. : Nora-print, 2002.— 394 s.
  4. Yarmoliuk M.T. Ahroekobiolohichni osnovy stvorennia ta vykorystannia luchnykh fitotsenoziv: monohr./M.T. Yarmoliuk, H.M. Sedilo, H.S. Konyk ta in. — Lviv, 2013. — 304 s.
  5. Kurhak V.H. Luchni ahrofitotsenozy/V.H. Kurhak. — K.: DIA, 2010. — 376 s.
  6. Zurek G. Use of amenity grasses — status quo and innovations/G. Zurek//Grassland — a European Resource?/Pr. of 24th Gen. Meeting of the Europ. Grassland Federation. - Lublin. - Poland. — 2012. V. 17. — P. 436-444.
  7. Klesnil A. Jeffektivnost' dlitel'nogo intensivnogo udobrenija estestvennyh travostoev/A. Klesnil, J. Velih, F. Turek//Nekotorye voprosy intensifikacii zemledelija SSSR i ChSSR. — M., 1977. — S. 10-19.
  8. Voloshin V.N. Botanicheskij sostav i produktivnost' lugovyh travostoev na seryh lesnyh pochvah/V.N. Voloshin//Vestnik belorusskoj gosudarstvennoj sel'skohozjajstvennoj akademii. — 2017. — №1. — S. 62-66.
  9. Luscher A. Sumbiotic nitrogen fixation of grass-clover leys under organic and conventional cropping/ A. Luscher., E. Frossard., J. Mayer., P. Mader.,and A. Oberson//Grassland — a European Resource?/Pr. of 24th Gen. Meeting of the Europ. Grassland Federation.- Lublin.- Poland.— 2012. V. 17. — P. 67-69.
  10. Kurhak V.H. Ratsionalne vykorystannia pryrodnykh kormovykh uhid Ukrainy/V.H. Kurhak//Zb. naukovykh prats Instytutu zemlerobstva NAAN. — K., 2013. — Vyp. 3-4. — S. 93-102.
  11. Rabotnov T.A. Biologicheskie i jekologicheskie osnovy racional'nogo ispol'zovanija i uluchshenija senokosov i pastbishh/T.A. Rabotnov//Prirodnye senokosy i pastbishha. — M. : Izd-vo s.h. literatury, zhurnalov j plakatov. — 1963. — S. 80-163.
  12. Babych A.O. Metodyka provedennia doslidiv po kormovyrobnytstvu/A.O. Babych.— Vinnytsia, 1993.— 73 s.