Olifirovych V. O.
Pages: 13-17.

Full article: 

---

Abstract

The purpose. To study effect of the content of grass mixtures and regime of their use upon the yield of dry matter and botanical content of total plant weight for legume-cereal grass stands. Methods. Field and laboratory probes. Results. In conditions of South part of Western Forest-steppe on downslopes with acid and low natural fertility soils the most productive was the grass mixture of lotus (Lótus corniculátus), 10 million/hectare viable seeds, with fescue (Festuca arundinacea), 2,1 million/hectare viable seeds, which ensured an exit of dry matter in size of 7,13 t/hectare at 3-hay cutting use of grass stand. Thus the share of lotus in total plant weight of the 1-st hay cutting made 47,1 – 50,9%, of the 2 – nd — 57,3 – 63,2%, and of the 3-rd hay cutting — 45 – 48,4 %. Conclusions. For effective use of slope lands it is necessary to cultivate grass mixture of lotus with fescue at 3-hay cutting regime.

---

Key words: perennial grasses, grass mixtures, dry matter, botanical content.

---

References

1. Kaminskyi V. F., Shevchenko I.P. (2013). Dosvid orhanizatsii ta efektyvnoho vykorystannia zemelnykh uhid v eroziino-nebezpechnykh ahrolandshaftakh zony Lisostepu. Posibnyk ukrainskoho khliboroba. Naukovo-praktychnyi shchorichnyk. T.1 P. 10-11. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bohovin A.V., Ptashnyk M.M., Oksymets O.L. (2014). Vplyv sposobiv vidnovlennia lukopasovyshchnykh travostoiv na yikhniu produktyvnist i yakist kormu. Zb. nauk. prats NNTs «Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN». Kyiv: VD «EKMO». Vyp. 4. P. 123–130. [in Ukrainian].
3. Bohovin A.V., Ptashnik M.M., Dudnyk S.V. (2012). Ekoloho-biolohichna struktura i produktyvnist trav’ianystykh tsenoziv za riznykh sposobiv yikh vidtvorennia na vyluchenykh z obrobitku ornykh zemliakh. Bohovin. Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannia. Naukovyi zhurnal. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr NUBiP. T. 4, № 3-4. P. 57-62. [in Ukrainian].
4. Davydiuk M.F., Belash V.A., Kochak H.M. (2001). Stvorennia vysokoproduktyvnykh sinokosiv za resursooshchadlyvoiu tekhnolohiieiu. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo. Mizhvidom. Tem. Nauk. zb. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka. Vyp. 47. P. 207–210. [in Ukrainian].
5. Mashchak Ia.I., Mizernyk D.I. (2013). Zastosuvannia mineralnoho udobrennia ta biopreparativ na vyrodzhenykh travostoiakh. Peredhirne ta hirske zemlerobstvo i tvarynnytstvo. Mizhvidom. tem. nauk. zb. Lviv – Obroshyno. Vyp. 55, Ch. I. P. 73-79. [in Ukrainian].
6. Kutuzova A.A. (2012). Nauchnoe obespechenye lugovodstva, ego rol' v sel'skom hozjajstve, v ekonomyke, ekologyy y racyonal'nom pryrodopol'zovanyy. Nauchnoe obespechenyy kormoproyzvodstva Rossyy: materyalyy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prak. elektron. konf., posvjashhennoj 100-letyju VNYY kormov ym. V.R. Vyl'jamsa, 12-13 yjunja 2012 g. Moskva, P. 82-90. [in Russian].
7. Bohovin A.V. (2009). Vymohy do doboru vydiv trav i travosumishei dlia stvorennia siianykh luk riznoho hospodarskoho vykorystannia. Zb. nauk. prats NNTs «Instytut zemlerobstva UAAN». Kyiv: VD «EKMO». Vyp. 3. P. 112–120. [in Ukrainian].
8. Iushchak V.S. (1992). Vplyv normy vysivu bahatorichnykh trav na vrozhainist siianykh ahrotsenoziv na erodovanykh skhylakh v horakh. Problemy ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Karpat. Mizhvidom. tem. nauk. zb. Uzhhorod: Karpaty. Vyp. 1. P. 106-111. [in Ukrainian].
9. Kovbasiuk P. (2013). Stroky skoshuvannia trav na sino. Propozytsiia. № 6. P. 64–67. [in Ukrainian].
10. Kotiash U.O., Panakhyd H.Ia., Yarmoliuk M.T. (2012). Vplyv mineralnykh dobryv na produktyvnist bahatorichnoho luchnoho travostoiu. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo. Mizhvidom. tem. nauk. zb. Vinnytsia: FOP Danyliuk V.H. Vyp. 73. P. 189-192. [in Ukrainian].
11. Metodyka provedennia doslidiv po kormovyrobnytstvu: [pid redaktsiieiu A.O. Babycha ]. Vinnytsia, 1994. 96 P. [in Ukrainian].
12. Dospehov B.A. (1979). Metodyka polevogo opyyta s osnovamy statystycheskoj obrabotky rezul'tatov yssledovanyj. Moskva: Kolos. 416 P. [in Russian].