06. Participation of individual chromosomes in constitutive cytogenetic abnormalities of cattle

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201803-06
Dzitsiuk V. V., Guzevatyj O. Je.
Pages: 35-39.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To study participation of individual chromosomes in constitutive cytogenetic abnormalities of cattle. Methods. Cultivation of lymphocytes, preparation of cytogenetic specimens. Grading and the record-keeping aberrations of chromosomes was realized under practical standards. Results. The frequency of participation of individual chromosomes in chromosomal rearrangement were studied. It was found that the most frequently happening chromosomal breaks were the following: 20.0% for the first chromosome, 16.0%, for the second one, 8.5% and 7.0% for the thirteenth and the twenty-first chromosomes accordingly. The breaks occurred in places between euchromatin and heterochromatin chromosome segments, as it was displayed by the results of differently colored samples analysis. Conclusions. The gained experimental data testify to the following: frequency of participation of individual chromosomes in constitutive cytogenetic abnormalities can be used as an index of non-specific destabilization of the chromosomal apparatus of animals.

Key words: cattle, karyotype, cytogenetic analysis, lymphocytes, aberrations of chromosomes.

References
  1. Yakovlev A.F. (1985). Tsitogeneticheskaya otsenka plemennykh zhivotnykh. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 256 s. [in Russian].
  2. Ernst L.K, Zhigachev AI. (1990). Profilaktika geneticheskikh anomaliy krupnogo rogatogo skota. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 240 s. [in Russian].
  3. Nadeau J.H., Taylor B.A. (1984). Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 81. P. 814–818.
  4. Kovalenko V.V. (2012). Mutatsionnye spektry u neobluchennykh i obluchennykh detey i potomkov obluchennykh roditeley (vtoroe pokolenie) v svyazi s avariey na ChAES. Naukovo-metodychnyi zhurnal Mykolaiv:ChDU im. Petra Mohyly. Naukovi pratsi. Ekolohiia.194(206). C.144-148. [in Russian].
  5. Andreev S.G., Eydel'man Yu.A. (2001). Puti obmennykh vzaimodeystviy povrezhdeniy, privodyashchikh k vnutrikhromosomnym aberratsiyam, zavisyashchikh ot struktury interfaznykh khromosom. Radiats. biologiya. Radioekologiya. T.41, № 5. S. 469–474. [in Russian].
  6. Kochneva M.L., Zhidenova A.N., Biltueva L.S., Kiseleva T.Yu. (2011). Novyy sluchay retsiproknoy translokatsii rep(13:26) u krupnogo rogatogo skota. Sel'skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. № 6. S. 84-89. [in Russian].
  7. Morad M., Jonasson J. (1973). Distribution of mitomycin induced breaks on human chromosomes. Heriditas. V. 74. P. 273-282.
  8. Moorhead P.S, Nowell P.C.,. Mellman W.J., Batipps D.M., Hungerford D.A. (1960). Chromosome preparations of leucocytes cultured human peripheral blood. Exp. Cell Res. N. 20. P. 613–616.
  9. Cribiu E.P., Berardino D.Di, G.P. Di Meo, Eggen A., Gallagher D.S., Gustavsson I., Hayes H., Iannuzzi L., Popescu C.P., Rubes J., Schmutz S., Stranzinger G., Vaiman A., Womack J. (2001). International System for Chromosome Nomenclature of Domestic Bovids (ISCNDB). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 92. C. 283-299.
  10. Seabright M. (1971). A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet. № 11. P. 971-972.
  11. Grafodatskiy A.S., Radzhabli S.I. (1988). Khromosomy sel'skokhozyaystvennykh i laboratornykh mlekopitayushchikh. Atlas. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib.otd-nie. 128 s. [in Russian].
  12. Nastyukova V.V., Stepanova E.I., Glazko V.I. (2002). Tsitogeneticheskie effekty u detey pri raznykh usloviyakh vozdeystviya malykh doz radiatsii. Tsitologiya i genetika. №6. S. 38-45. [in Russian].
  13. Vogel F., Motulsky A.G. (1996). Humah genetics: Problem and approaches. Spengler - Verlag. Berlin. German. T. 22, № 1. –– P. 67-72
  14. Toul N., Elhjouji A., Thierens H., Kirsch-Volders M. (2000). Analysis of chromosome loss and chromosome segretion in ctokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes: non-disjunction is the prevalent mistake in chromosome segregation produced by low dose exposure to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis. V.15, №1. P.1-7.
  15. Il'inskikh N.N., Bocharov E.A., Il'inskikh I.N. (1984). Infektsionnyy mutagenez. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvovo Tomskogo universiteta. 160 s. [in Russian].
  16. Vig B.K. (1983). Sequence of centromere separation: occurrence, possible, significance and control. Cancer Genet.Cytogenet. V.8, №  3. P. 249-274.
  17. Tarnok A., Mehes K., Kosztolanyi G. (1993). No effect of vanadate on centromere separation sequence. Acta Biol. Hung. V. 44, № 2-3. P.297-301.
  18. Haus Olga. (1985). Chromosome aberrations in phenotypically different rat rhabdo 127 c myosarcoma cell lines. Clin.Genet. V.28, №5. C.435.
  19. Kuznetsova S.M., Gur’yanova N.V., Kalashnikov M.V. (1996). Khromosomniy polimorfizm: biologichni ta medichni aspekti. Tsitologiya i genetika. T.30, №2. S. 67-74. [in Russian].
  20. Lezhava T.A. (1980). Geterokhromatizatsiya –– odin iz vedushchikh faktorov stareniya. Tsitologiya i genetika. T.14, №3. S. 71-76. [in Russian].
  21. Thomas C.A. (1970). The theory of the master gene. The neurosciences second study program. Ed.F.O.Schmitt.Rock. Univ.press. N.4. P.102-121.
  22. Tartof K.D., Bishop C., Jones M. et al. Towards an understanding of position effect variegation. Devel. genetics. V.10. P. 162-176.