07. Effect of fertilizer on productivity of legume-cereal grass mixture

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201811-07
Olifirovych V. O., Osadchuk V. D., Osadchuk D. V., Makovijchuk S. D.
Pages: 48-53.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To study effect of fertilizers on dynamics of harvesting dry matter and feeding capacity of grass mixture of lotus and timothy. Methods. Field and laboratory researches. Results. Results of researches of influence of bacterial preparation Rizobofit, phosphoric and molybdenum fertilizers on dynamics of harvesting dry matter for the first 3 years of use of legume-cereal grass stand are brought. Increment of dry matter from application of Rizobofit makes 3,5%, at joint application of biological product on the background of phosphate fertilizer (P60) — 18,6%. High efficiency of Rizobofit was observed in the 1-st hay cutting of the first 2 years of use of the grass stand. Combination of treatment of seeds with Rizobofit and ammonium molybdate was inefficient, and was followed by decrease of exit of dry matter. They also determined influence of ways of fertilizing upon feeding capacity of perennial agrophytocenosis. So, on the average for the first 3 years of use of perennial grasses the least productive was legume-cereal grass stand without use of fertilizers where exit of dry matter had made 6,88 t/hectare, feed units — 5,26 t/hectare, crude protein — 0,91 t/hectare. Use of fertilizers essentially raised carrying capacity of grass mixture of lotus with timothy. So, inoculation of seeds of lotus with Rizobofit promoted increase in exit of dry matter for 0,24 t/hectare, or 3,5%, feed units — for 0,26 t/hectare, or 4,9%, crude protein — for 0,15 t/hectare, or 16,5%. So, in their researches use of Rizobofit had more influenced exit of crude protein for 1 hectare. Application of biological product Rizobofit on the background of phosphate fertilizers (P60) provided increase in exit of dry matter (in relation to grass stand without fertilizers) on 1,28 t/hectare, or 19,7%; feed units — on 0,99 t/hectare, or 18,8%; crude protein — on 0,32 t/hectare, or 35,2%. Conclusions. Entering of phosphate fertilizers into combination to inoculation of seeds of lotus with Rizobofit promoted formation of the maximum feed capacity of legume-cereal grass stand. Use of Rizofobit plays an important role in increase of gathering crude protein. So, at joint application of biological product and phosphoric fertilizer (P60) the output of crude protein for 1 hectare has increased for 35,2% in comparison with a variant without fertilizer.


Key words: productivity, lotus, timothy, fertilizers, inoculation.



References
  1. Cherkasova V.A. (1976). Osvoenie sklonov pod pastbishcha i senokosy. [The development of slopes for pastures and hay]. Moskva: Kolos, 208 p. [In Russian].
  2. Carlsson G., Huss-Danell K. (2003). Nitrogen fixation in perennial/forage legumes in the field. Plant and Soil. V. 253, Is. 2. P. 353–372.
  3. Ledgard S. (2001). Nitrogen cycling in low input legumebased agriculture, with emphasis on legume/grass pastures. Plant and Soil. V. 228, Is. 1. P. 43–59.
  4. Ledgard S., Steele K. (1992). Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume/grass pastures. Plant and Soil. V. 141, Is. 1–2. P. 137–153.
  5. Patyka V.P., Petrychenko V.F. (2004). Mikrobna azotfiksatsiia u suchasnomu kormovyrobnytstvi. [Microbial nitrogen fixation in modern fodder production]. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia. Vyp. 53. P. 3–11. [In Ukrainian].
  6. Tyshchenko O.D., Andrusiva L.V. (2001). Reaktsiia sortiv liutserny na inokuliatsiiu shtamamy RNIZOBIUM MELILOTI. [Reaction of alfalfa varieties to inoculation by strains RNIZOBIUM MELILOTI]. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka. Vyp. 47. P. 49–50. [In Ukrainian].
  7. Petrychenko V.F., Tykhonovych I.A., Kots S.Ia., Patyka M.V. (2012). Silskohospodarska mikrobiolohiia i zbalansovanyi rozvytok ahroekosystem. [Agricultural microbiology and balanced development of agroecosystems]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. No 8. P. 5–11. [In Ukrainian].
  8. Petrychenko V.F., Kots S.Ia. (2014). Symbiotychni systemy u suchasnomu silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi. [Symbiotic systems in modern agricultural production]. Visnyk NANU. No 3. P. 57–66. [In Ukrainian].
  9. Hrytsaienko Z.M., Ponomarenko S.P., Karpenko V.P., Leontiuk I.B. (2008). Biolohichno aktyvni rechovyny v roslynnytstvi. [Biologically active substances in crop production]. Kyiv: ZAT «Nichlava». 352 p. [In Ukrainian].
  10. Kovtun K.P., Veklenko Yu.A., Bezvuhliak L.I. (2013). Vplyv udobrennia ta inokuliatsii na formuvannia botanichnoho skladu bobovo-zlakovoho travostoiu z liadventsem rohatym. [Effect of fertilization and inoculation on the formation of the botanical composition of bean-cereal grass with larva horn]. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo. Vinnytsia: TOV «Vydavnytstvo-drukarnia Dilo». Vyp.75. P. 155–160. [In Ukrainian].
  11. Veklenko Yu.A., Kovtun K.P., Bezvuhliak L.I. et al. (2013). Ahroekolohichne obgruntuvannia adaptyvnykh resursooshchadnykh tekhnolohii stvorennia ta vykorystannia bahatorichnykh kormovykh ahrofitotsenoziv. [Agroecological substantiation of adaptive resource-saving technologies for the creation and use of perennial forage agrophytocenoses]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. Spets. vyp. P. 78–83. [In Ukrainian].
  12. Volkohon V.V., Berdnikov O.M., Tsentylo L.V. (2013). Mikrobni preparaty. Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia u tekhnolohiiakh vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur. [Microbial drugs. Peculiarities of application in crop growing technologies]. Posibnyk ukrainskoho khliboroba. Naukovo-praktychnyi zbirnyk «Zernobobovi ta bobovi kormovi kultury v konteksti vidnovlennia ahrotsenoziv». Kyiv: TOV «Akadempres». T. 2. P. 44–73. [In Ukrainian].
  13. Litvinov D.V. (2016). Dynamika vmistu rukhomoho fosforu v chornozemi typovomu v korotko rotatsiinykh sivozminakh. [Dynamics of the content of mobile phosphorus in chernozem typical in short rotation crop rotations]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs «Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN». Kyiv: VP «Edelveis». Vyp. 2. P. 13–23. [In Ukrainian].
  14. Topolnyi F.P., Lyshchuk S.S. (1993). Rezervy i zapasy fosforu v gruntakh Ukrainskykh Karpat. [Reserves and reserves of phosphorus in the soils of the Ukrainian Carpathians]. Problemy ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Karpat: mizhvidom. tem. nauk. zb. Uzhhorod: UVVK «Patent». Vyp. 2. P. 50–58. [In Ukrainian].
  15. Makarenko P.S., Demydas H.I., Koziar O.M. (2002). Lukivnytstvo. [Onion]. Kyiv: Nora-print. 394 p. [In Ukrainian].
  16. Popova S.I., Kiryakova E.M., Yarmolenko E.N. (2010). Vliyanie pokrovnoy kul'tury, norm vyseva i mineral'nykh udobreniy na urozhaynost' kormovoy massy i semyan lyadventsa rogatogo. [The influence of the cover crop, seeding rates and mineral fertilizers on the yield of fodder and seed of horned bridle]. Innovatsionnomu razvitiyu APK — nauchnoe obespechenie: Sb. nauch. statey Mezhdunar. nauch.-prak. konf., posvyashchennoy 80-letiyu Permskoy gos. s.-kh. akademii im. ak. D.N. Pryanishnikova, g. Perm', 18 noyabrya 2010 g. Perm', Ch. 2. P. 177–182. [In Russian].
  17. Babych A.O. Ed. Metodyka provedennia doslidiv po kormovyrobnytstvu. [Methodology of experiments on fodder production]. (1994). Vinnytsia: Derzhavna kartohrafichna fabryka. 87 p. [In Ukrainian].
  18. Vudmaska V.Iu., Prylutskyi P.P. (1975). Vyznachennia pozhyvnosti i yakosti kormiv u hospodarstvi. [Determination of nutrition and quality of feed at the farm]. Kyiv: Urozhai, 136 p. [In Ukrainian].