02. Effect of fertilizers and soil cultivation on productivity of cultures of crop rotation

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201908-02
Tanchyk S. P., Tsentylo L. V., Tsiuk O. A.
Pages: 11-16.

Abstract
The purpose. To determine effect of different systems of basic soil cultivation and methods of fertilizing on productivity of crops of field rotation. Methods. Field, statistical (statistical analysis of results of probes), comparative-calculation (determination of power efficiency of growing crops in crop rotation). They carried out experiments according to conventional techniques in farming agriculture. Weather conditions during probes on the average appeared typical for Kiev area, however they differed on rainfall and sum of active temperatures above 10 C in some months and years, and as a result productivity of crops varied. Results. Probes have shown that use of organic-mineral fertilizer system has not essentially lowered productivity of winter wheat in comparison with mineral one. Essential lowering was observed at organic fertilizer system: in a link with Lucerne — on 32%, soya bean — 31,3, corn for silage — on 33,3% in comparison with use of mineral system. The highest productivity of winter wheat was on the background of moldboard-subsoil cultivation. Favorable soil conditions for yield of root crops were created at mineral fertilizer system. Application differential and moldboard-subsoil cultivation promoted essential growth of productivity of sugar beet. Productivity of sunflower was essentially above at use of mineral fertilizer system. At application of organic-mineral system productivity was diminished by 6%. Productivity at differential and moldboard-subsoil cultivations essentially did not differ (a variance was 2,6 t/hectare). Conclusions. By results of probes it is established that the best alternative for basic soil cultivation in crop rotation had appeared moldboard-subsoil one. Its use secured increased productivity of beet sugar, winter wheat after soya bean and corn for silage as compared to control. Application of shallow cultivation led to lowering of productivity of cultures of crop rotation. Use of organic-mineral fertilizer system essentially did not reduce productivity of cultures of crop rotation in comparison with mineral system.


Key words: typical chernozem, soil cultivation, fertilizers, yield ability, productivity.



References
  1. Boiko, P.I., Furmanets, M.H. (2012). Vplyv poperednykiv na volohozabezpechenist i urozhainist pshenytsi ozymoi u zakhidnomu Lisostepu Vpliv poperednikiv na vologozabezpechenist i urozhajnist pshenici ozimoyi u zahidnomu Lisostepu [Effect of precursors on water availability and winter wheat yield in western forest steppe]. Collection of scientific works Institute of Agriculture: Edelveis, 1-2, 10-14. [in Ukr.].
  2. Miroshnychenko, M.M., Dotsenko, O.V., Panasenko, Ye.V., Nikonenko, V.M. (2013). Naukovi osnovy udobrennia ozymoi pshenytsi za danymy gruntovo-roslynnoi diahnostyky [Scientific bases of winter wheat fertilizer according to soil and vegetable diagnostics]. Kharkiv: FOP Fedorko M.Iu. [in Ukr.].
  3. Petrychenko, V.F., Korniichuk, O.F. (2018). Faktory stabilizatsii vyrobnytstva zerna pshenytsi ozymoi v Lisostepu Pravoberezhnomu [Factors for stabilizing winter wheat grain production in the Forest Steppe Right Bank]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 2, 17–23. [in Ukr.].
  4. Boiko, P.I., Litvinov, D.V., Demydenko, O.V. et al. (2016). Produktyvnist silskohospodarskykh kultur u riznorotatsiinykh sivozminakh na typovykh chornozemakh [Crop productivity in rotational rotations on typical chernozems]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 12, 11–14. [in Ukr.].
  5. Tkalich, I.D., Oleksiuk, O.M., Tkalich, Yu.I., Kulyk, A.O. (2011). Osnovnyi obrobitok gruntu pid polovi kultury [Main tillage under field crops]. Bulletin of the Steppe Zone Agricultural Institute, 1, 15–20. [in Ukr.].
  6. Rhoton, F.E. (2000). Infiuence of Time on Soil Response to no-till Practices. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 700-709.
  7. Medvedovskyi, O.V. & Ivanenko, P.I. (2002). Enerhetychnyi analiz intensyvnykh tekhnolohii v silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi [Power analysis of intensive technologies in agricultural production]. Kyiv: Urozhaj. [in Ukr.].
  8. Lisovyi, M.V., Shymel, V.V., Nikonenko, V.M. (2019). Efektyvnist mineralnykh dobryv pid pshenytsiu ozymu na chornozemi typovomu Lisostepu Livoberezhnoho vysokoho Efektyvnist mineralnykh dobryv pid pshenytsiu ozymu na chornozemi typovomu Lisostepu Livoberezhnoho vysokoho [Efficiency of mineral fertilizers under winter wheat on chernozem typical of the Forest-steppe of the Left Bank high]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 5, 16-21. [in Ukr.].
  9. Fatieiev, A.I., Martynenko, V.M., Sobko, M.H. (2006). Produktyvnist kultur sivozminy i vynos elementiv zhyvlennia za riznykh system udobrennia ta obrobitku gruntu [Productivity of crop rotation and removal of power elements for different fertilizer and soil tillage systems]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 3, 11-14. [in Ukr.].
  10. Almetov, N. S. (1997). Vliyanie sposobov obrabotki pochvy na urozhajnost zernovyh i kartofelya [Influence of tillage methods on the yield of grain and potatoes]. Agriculture, 2, 25-26. [in Russ.].
  11. Shishlyannikov, I. D. (1997). Minimalizaciya obrabotki pochvy pod pozdnie kultury. [Minimizing tillage for late crops]. Agriculture, 3, 24-25. [in Russ.].